<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCOTUS:  Is NRA Already Backtracking On Sotomayor Opposition?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/08/04/scotus-is-nra-already-backtracking-on-sotomayor-opposition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/08/04/scotus-is-nra-already-backtracking-on-sotomayor-opposition/</link>
	<description>Dip your toe in the legal waters and change politics as you know it.  http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:06:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adie</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/08/04/scotus-is-nra-already-backtracking-on-sotomayor-opposition/#comment-17218</link>
		<dc:creator>Adie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 14:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/08/04/scotus-is-nra-already-backtracking-on-sotomayor-opposition/#comment-17218</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;“Si!”  *G*&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Si!”  *G*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adie</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/08/04/scotus-is-nra-already-backtracking-on-sotomayor-opposition/#comment-17217</link>
		<dc:creator>Adie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 14:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/08/04/scotus-is-nra-already-backtracking-on-sotomayor-opposition/#comment-17217</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Enjoying the chatter and erudite speculation, but I must go tend to piles of “stuff”.  Carry on, dear Pups. ;-&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoying the chatter and erudite speculation, but I must go tend to piles of “stuff”.  Carry on, dear Pups. ;-&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greenwarrior</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/08/04/scotus-is-nra-already-backtracking-on-sotomayor-opposition/#comment-17164</link>
		<dc:creator>greenwarrior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 16:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/08/04/scotus-is-nra-already-backtracking-on-sotomayor-opposition/#comment-17164</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;More than that, this ought to be a freeing moment for Democrats.  The GOP is not going to vote for anything you want.  More than that, they’ll use their proxy groups to try and cheat their way through a vote to provide them cover.  Instead of negotiating, why not try doing what you really want to do instead:  real health care reform, serious environmental regulation, judges whose passion for the law is only exceeded by their willingness to stand up for it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;amen, sistah!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>More than that, this ought to be a freeing moment for Democrats.  The GOP is not going to vote for anything you want.  More than that, they’ll use their proxy groups to try and cheat their way through a vote to provide them cover.  Instead of negotiating, why not try doing what you really want to do instead:  real health care reform, serious environmental regulation, judges whose passion for the law is only exceeded by their willingness to stand up for it.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>amen, sistah!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foothillsmike</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/08/04/scotus-is-nra-already-backtracking-on-sotomayor-opposition/#comment-17163</link>
		<dc:creator>foothillsmike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/08/04/scotus-is-nra-already-backtracking-on-sotomayor-opposition/#comment-17163</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;C-span 1 doing the hearing on financial regulation.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C-span 1 doing the hearing on financial regulation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Hardin Smith</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/08/04/scotus-is-nra-already-backtracking-on-sotomayor-opposition/#comment-17162</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Hardin Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/08/04/scotus-is-nra-already-backtracking-on-sotomayor-opposition/#comment-17162</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;btw, for those keeping track, the Senate is still meandering its way through the Agriculture bill this morning.  Once they finish it, then they are going to begin on the Sotomayor nomination.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It may yet be a while.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw, for those keeping track, the Senate is still meandering its way through the Agriculture bill this morning.  Once they finish it, then they are going to begin on the Sotomayor nomination.</p>
<p>It may yet be a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Hardin Smith</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/08/04/scotus-is-nra-already-backtracking-on-sotomayor-opposition/#comment-17161</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Hardin Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/08/04/scotus-is-nra-already-backtracking-on-sotomayor-opposition/#comment-17161</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That sounds like an issue with your carrier, but I’ll pass it along to the tech folks just in case.   You might want to contact your provider and let them know you are having intermittent problems.  It may be a software issue for them.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That sounds like an issue with your carrier, but I’ll pass it along to the tech folks just in case.   You might want to contact your provider and let them know you are having intermittent problems.  It may be a software issue for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perris</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/08/04/scotus-is-nra-already-backtracking-on-sotomayor-opposition/#comment-17160</link>
		<dc:creator>perris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/08/04/scotus-is-nra-already-backtracking-on-sotomayor-opposition/#comment-17160</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;More than that, this ought to be a freeing moment for Democrats.  The GOP is not going to vote for anything you want.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I hate to say it but the democrats are really being idiots when it comes to this point, we have known from the very start that they would oppose every initiative even when they agreed with that initiative&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rove made the declaration of terms&lt;br /&gt;
rush made that missistatement as well&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;yet the democrats act like this never happened and are surprised when that’s the way the republicans behave&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>More than that, this ought to be a freeing moment for Democrats.  The GOP is not going to vote for anything you want.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I hate to say it but the democrats are really being idiots when it comes to this point, we have known from the very start that they would oppose every initiative even when they agreed with that initiative</p>
<p>rove made the declaration of terms<br />
rush made that missistatement as well</p>
<p>yet the democrats act like this never happened and are surprised when that’s the way the republicans behave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foothillsmike</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/08/04/scotus-is-nra-already-backtracking-on-sotomayor-opposition/#comment-17159</link>
		<dc:creator>foothillsmike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/08/04/scotus-is-nra-already-backtracking-on-sotomayor-opposition/#comment-17159</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Whenever I try to refresh I wind up on a page saying site could not be find. My carrier thru Quest is linked thru msn.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever I try to refresh I wind up on a page saying site could not be find. My carrier thru Quest is linked thru msn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Hardin Smith</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/08/04/scotus-is-nra-already-backtracking-on-sotomayor-opposition/#comment-17158</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Hardin Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/08/04/scotus-is-nra-already-backtracking-on-sotomayor-opposition/#comment-17158</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You having problems?  What sort?  I haven’t had a blip — but I’m on my iMAC.  What browser/computer are you using and can you tell me a bit more about whatever problem you may be having so I can alert the tech crew?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You having problems?  What sort?  I haven’t had a blip — but I’m on my iMAC.  What browser/computer are you using and can you tell me a bit more about whatever problem you may be having so I can alert the tech crew?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foothillsmike</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/08/04/scotus-is-nra-already-backtracking-on-sotomayor-opposition/#comment-17157</link>
		<dc:creator>foothillsmike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/08/04/scotus-is-nra-already-backtracking-on-sotomayor-opposition/#comment-17157</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Refreshing on this site sure has been nightmareish this morning&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Refreshing on this site sure has been nightmareish this morning</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.196 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-17 22:28:49 -->

