That Sinking Feeling: How’s Your Budget Holding Out?
SCOTUS: Compare GOP Stall On Alito And CAP With Full Disclosure On Sotomayor And PRLDEF

Health Care: We’re Gonna Hold You To That Guarantee, Sen. Schumer


Yesterday on Face the Nation, Sen. Chuck Schumer guaranteed that the public option would be in whatever health care bill makes its way through the House and Senate.

Guaranteed it.

Here’s the exchange with Schumer:

DICKERSON: . . . Senator Schumer, I want to bring you in. You’ve been trying to find some kind of middle ground. You’re a supporter of a pure public option, but you’ve also been trying to work with Senator Grassley and even Democrats in your own party who have been talking about a co-op. Where do those negotiations stand?

SCHUMER: Well, we’re making every effort to reach common ground. But let me just say this. We need somebody to keep the public — the private insurance companies honest. They are terribly concentrated. In Chuck Grassley’s own state, 71 percent by one company.

In 94 percent of the markets, according to the Justice Department, health insurance is highly concentrated. So without a public option, you’re going to have no competition. And the public is going to be forced — you know, they don’t like the insurance companies simply raising prices and raising prices and cutting back on coverage and cutting back on coverage. . . .

. . .Already, John, the House has proposed its plan, has a strong public option. The HELP Committee, the other committee in the Senate doing this, has proposed a strong public option. The Finance Committee, we’re trying to come to some compromise but make no mistake about it, the president is for this strongly.

There will be a public option in the final bill, some form of it. . . .  We want it to be a fair, level playing field, but you need something the big boys honest. And the only thing that really is out there is a public option.

We don’t trust the private insurance companies left to their own devices and neither do the American people. Seventy percent of the American people support a public option. (emphasis mine)

We’re going to hold you to that guarantee, Chuck. No idea when you became the Great and Powerful Oz on health care on the Hill.

But now that you’ve made this public guarantee?

We expect you and everyone else in the House and Senate to deliver on it.  And we’ll be watching you closely to be certain that you do.

(YouTube — Sen. Schumer on Face the Nation.)


  Spotlight
7 Responses to "Health Care: We’re Gonna Hold You To That Guarantee, Sen. Schumer"
Christy Hardin Smith | Monday July 6, 2009 05:58 am 1

I know this is likely just Schumer being his usual mouthy self, and speaking for no one other than his own ego in the moment in front of a teevee camera.

But I’m going to hold him to this anyway. Because he opened his yap on teevee and promised it. And someone ought to make sure he understands the value of sticking to his word through thick and thin — especially where some of the public might get a little good out of it.


foothillsmike | Monday July 6, 2009 06:20 am 2

Morning Christy. Lets hold them all accountable!


Christy Hardin Smith | Monday July 6, 2009 06:23 am 3
In response to foothillsmike @ 2

We’re trying — it’s hard to penetrate the Beltway morass, though, isn’t it? If anyone has ideas on a good way to do that on some current issue, I am all ears and then some.


Christy Hardin Smith | Monday July 6, 2009 06:24 am 4

btw, Digby has an interview video of Krugman on health care up for the watching. Interesting stuff.


foothillsmike | Monday July 6, 2009 06:34 am 5

My thought is to try to pass a constitutional ammendment starting at the state legislatures. This ammendment would say that any politician that receives more than the maximum individual donation from any company must recuse themselves from any vote that deals with issues involving that company or business. Failure to recuse would result in removal from office. This would include PACS, funding events etc. any and all contributions that benefit a legistor.


maggiesboy | Monday July 6, 2009 07:05 pm 6

Why not a constitutional amendment for public campaign financing? Much cleaner. Less fuss, no muss.


Leen | Wednesday July 8, 2009 05:32 am 7

Schumer voted for the war in Iraq, Mukasey and the Kyl Liebermann amendment. Why would folks trust Schumer? This man is a warmonger. ..next stop Iran if Schumer and pals have their way


Sorry but the comments are closed on this post
SCOTUS: Compare GOP Stall On Alito And CAP With Full Disclosure On Sotomayor And PRLDEF
That Sinking Feeling: How’s Your Budget Holding Out?

Close