<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Obama WH/DOJ Policy Restrict Politicized Communications?  Or Not?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/06/05/does-obama-whdoj-policy-restrict-politicized-communications-or-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/06/05/does-obama-whdoj-policy-restrict-politicized-communications-or-not/</link>
	<description>Dip your toe in the legal waters and change politics as you know it.  http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:06:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Hardin Smith</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/06/05/does-obama-whdoj-policy-restrict-politicized-communications-or-not/#comment-12910</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Hardin Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/06/05/does-obama-whdoj-policy-restrict-politicized-communications-or-not/#comment-12910</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No question they were skirting the rules from the get go — energy task force and any number of other areas, including the warrantless NSA spying in violation of FISA laws that ramped up well before 9/11.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which just makes that later date of “official” policy change all the more squirrelly in my mind.  *g*&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No question they were skirting the rules from the get go — energy task force and any number of other areas, including the warrantless NSA spying in violation of FISA laws that ramped up well before 9/11.</p>
<p>Which just makes that later date of “official” policy change all the more squirrelly in my mind.  *g*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayne</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/06/05/does-obama-whdoj-policy-restrict-politicized-communications-or-not/#comment-12909</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/06/05/does-obama-whdoj-policy-restrict-politicized-communications-or-not/#comment-12909</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, but I seriously think there was a concerted effort at hijinx during that 2001-2002 window, especially when you consider what Deadeye was doing with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Task_Force&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Energy Task Force&lt;/a&gt;. Task Force held nearly all its meetings within first 100 days of Bush/Cheney administration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What looked like a bug in Bush/Cheney earliest days was probably a feature…especially if you consider all but one of the U.S. Attorneys later released in 2006-2007 were from states with Enron exposures and Native American lands with FERC right-of-ways.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which makes it all the more important that you do ask the questions now, so that our own team doesn’t make the same bugs, um, features, if they are truly committed to transparency.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but I seriously think there was a concerted effort at hijinx during that 2001-2002 window, especially when you consider what Deadeye was doing with the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Task_Force" rel="nofollow">Energy Task Force</a>. Task Force held nearly all its meetings within first 100 days of Bush/Cheney administration.</p>
<p>What looked like a bug in Bush/Cheney earliest days was probably a feature…especially if you consider all but one of the U.S. Attorneys later released in 2006-2007 were from states with Enron exposures and Native American lands with FERC right-of-ways.</p>
<p>Which makes it all the more important that you do ask the questions now, so that our own team doesn’t make the same bugs, um, features, if they are truly committed to transparency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Hardin Smith</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/06/05/does-obama-whdoj-policy-restrict-politicized-communications-or-not/#comment-12906</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Hardin Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/06/05/does-obama-whdoj-policy-restrict-politicized-communications-or-not/#comment-12906</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It’s worth noting that the Bush Administration didn’t put their new, expanded policy into place until 2002 in terms of communication expansion.  So I think the Obama folks get some leeway of time to try and undo the kinks in the system.  It’s a LOT to untangle all at once, at DOJ especially.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s worth noting that the Bush Administration didn’t put their new, expanded policy into place until 2002 in terms of communication expansion.  So I think the Obama folks get some leeway of time to try and undo the kinks in the system.  It’s a LOT to untangle all at once, at DOJ especially.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rayne</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/06/05/does-obama-whdoj-policy-restrict-politicized-communications-or-not/#comment-12904</link>
		<dc:creator>Rayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/06/05/does-obama-whdoj-policy-restrict-politicized-communications-or-not/#comment-12904</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;So glad you are covering this issue, Christy. Was afraid it was going to slide by without attention by a blogger whose cred and reach could assure attention at the right levels of power.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I tend to think Team Obama is still trying to figure out a bunch of stuff on the fly, running as hard as they can while strapped with decrepit technology they’d never tolerate in the real world, and then trying to right the wrongs of last eight years. Not an enviable task, somewhat more challenging than attempting a corporate turnaround with a financially challenged organization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Re: the Peanut — you might consider instituting a weekly trip to the library and a daily reading period. My kids aren’t allowed on any electronics, from TV to PC to games, from 10am - 6pm each day, and are required to read for at least 1 hour at a minimum. Plus we have a project book, one that I read to them at bedtime several times a week. This all works easily for 9-to-15 year olds, might have to start with a smaller scope for a new first grader, but after several years of this the kids not only expect it but love it.  When they were younger it was nap time, but now reading time gives us all a break that’s acceptable to their age group (and if they fall asleep coincidentally, so much the better…).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think this year I’m going to add a new wrinkle: they must read one foreign news article about a current event overseas each day, before 10am, and they must be prepared to discuss it at dinner. The teenager has been doing something like this for her social studies school work this year; I’m amazed at what she’s gotten out of it, and it might keep my mini-wonk son both prepared and on his toes. His fifth grade class reads &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/studentnews/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CNN Student News&lt;/a&gt; every day together in the classroom, and he’s generally better informed about current affairs than his dad is by the time they get home. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Don’t know if the Peanut’s school participates in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.arbookfind.com/default.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Accelerated Reader (AR) program&lt;/a&gt;, but this is a chance to get a jump on it if they do. AR books are rated by age appropriateness and complexity of content and assigned points. Many school systems in Michigan use AR as a gauge of children’s reading ability and amount they are reading; our school system requires kids to set a goal each grade period, a set level of points appropriate to their reading level, which they must achieve or exceed as part of their curriculum. I’ve encouraged my kids to read ahead during the summer months, requiring them to read only AR-listed/-rated books during their daily reading time, so that they are better prepared when schools starts. (Intramural activities, even if kept to one per season, can really cut into reading time; better to read ahead just in case.) Link above should provide lists/collections of books which Peanut may be reading in the near-term as a first grader. Good luck keeping that bright little mind and busy hands occupied!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So glad you are covering this issue, Christy. Was afraid it was going to slide by without attention by a blogger whose cred and reach could assure attention at the right levels of power.</p>
<p>I tend to think Team Obama is still trying to figure out a bunch of stuff on the fly, running as hard as they can while strapped with decrepit technology they’d never tolerate in the real world, and then trying to right the wrongs of last eight years. Not an enviable task, somewhat more challenging than attempting a corporate turnaround with a financially challenged organization.</p>
<p>Re: the Peanut — you might consider instituting a weekly trip to the library and a daily reading period. My kids aren’t allowed on any electronics, from TV to PC to games, from 10am &#8211; 6pm each day, and are required to read for at least 1 hour at a minimum. Plus we have a project book, one that I read to them at bedtime several times a week. This all works easily for 9-to-15 year olds, might have to start with a smaller scope for a new first grader, but after several years of this the kids not only expect it but love it.  When they were younger it was nap time, but now reading time gives us all a break that’s acceptable to their age group (and if they fall asleep coincidentally, so much the better…).</p>
<p>I think this year I’m going to add a new wrinkle: they must read one foreign news article about a current event overseas each day, before 10am, and they must be prepared to discuss it at dinner. The teenager has been doing something like this for her social studies school work this year; I’m amazed at what she’s gotten out of it, and it might keep my mini-wonk son both prepared and on his toes. His fifth grade class reads <a href="http://www.cnn.com/studentnews/" rel="nofollow">CNN Student News</a> every day together in the classroom, and he’s generally better informed about current affairs than his dad is by the time they get home. </p>
<p>Don’t know if the Peanut’s school participates in the <a href="http://www.arbookfind.com/default.aspx" rel="nofollow">Accelerated Reader (AR) program</a>, but this is a chance to get a jump on it if they do. AR books are rated by age appropriateness and complexity of content and assigned points. Many school systems in Michigan use AR as a gauge of children’s reading ability and amount they are reading; our school system requires kids to set a goal each grade period, a set level of points appropriate to their reading level, which they must achieve or exceed as part of their curriculum. I’ve encouraged my kids to read ahead during the summer months, requiring them to read only AR-listed/-rated books during their daily reading time, so that they are better prepared when schools starts. (Intramural activities, even if kept to one per season, can really cut into reading time; better to read ahead just in case.) Link above should provide lists/collections of books which Peanut may be reading in the near-term as a first grader. Good luck keeping that bright little mind and busy hands occupied!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AZ Matt</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/06/05/does-obama-whdoj-policy-restrict-politicized-communications-or-not/#comment-12903</link>
		<dc:creator>AZ Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/06/05/does-obama-whdoj-policy-restrict-politicized-communications-or-not/#comment-12903</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, that is what I saw at TPM yesterday.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that is what I saw at TPM yesterday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AZ Matt</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/06/05/does-obama-whdoj-policy-restrict-politicized-communications-or-not/#comment-12902</link>
		<dc:creator>AZ Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/06/05/does-obama-whdoj-policy-restrict-politicized-communications-or-not/#comment-12902</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Dang!  Obama didn’t make me Ambassador to the Commonwealth of the Bahamas.  It went to someone else.   Too bad, I have great experience on tropical beaches.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/news/2009/06/president_obama_announces_intent_to_nominate_key_a_2.php?ref=fpb&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;President Obama Announces Intent to Nominate Key Administration Posts&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dang!  Obama didn’t make me Ambassador to the Commonwealth of the Bahamas.  It went to someone else.   Too bad, I have great experience on tropical beaches.<br /><a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/news/2009/06/president_obama_announces_intent_to_nominate_key_a_2.php?ref=fpb" rel="nofollow">President Obama Announces Intent to Nominate Key Administration Posts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foothillsmike</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/06/05/does-obama-whdoj-policy-restrict-politicized-communications-or-not/#comment-12901</link>
		<dc:creator>foothillsmike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/06/05/does-obama-whdoj-policy-restrict-politicized-communications-or-not/#comment-12901</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I believe that Holder has asked that the cases be sent back to the courts and that DOJ wishes to pursue conviction only doing so within the law. The request was that the two be released from prison on their own recognizance.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that Holder has asked that the cases be sent back to the courts and that DOJ wishes to pursue conviction only doing so within the law. The request was that the two be released from prison on their own recognizance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Hardin Smith</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/06/05/does-obama-whdoj-policy-restrict-politicized-communications-or-not/#comment-12900</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Hardin Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/06/05/does-obama-whdoj-policy-restrict-politicized-communications-or-not/#comment-12900</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is part of an ongoing series of screw-ups n corruption prosecutions up there.  I don’t think DOJ has gotten to the bottom of the wholesale problems in that mess as yet, frankly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is tied in with the Alaska legislature corruption — of which Ted Stevens’ son was allegedly involved in taking oil money “gifts” of some kind, if I remember correctly.  And, of course, the Stevens’ prosecution itself was a fricking mess.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are also clean-up issues with the public corruption unit ongoing as well, as fall-out from that case and others.  The DOJ was left in an utter mess.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is part of an ongoing series of screw-ups n corruption prosecutions up there.  I don’t think DOJ has gotten to the bottom of the wholesale problems in that mess as yet, frankly.</p>
<p>This is tied in with the Alaska legislature corruption — of which Ted Stevens’ son was allegedly involved in taking oil money “gifts” of some kind, if I remember correctly.  And, of course, the Stevens’ prosecution itself was a fricking mess.</p>
<p>There are also clean-up issues with the public corruption unit ongoing as well, as fall-out from that case and others.  The DOJ was left in an utter mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leen</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/06/05/does-obama-whdoj-policy-restrict-politicized-communications-or-not/#comment-12899</link>
		<dc:creator>Leen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/06/05/does-obama-whdoj-policy-restrict-politicized-communications-or-not/#comment-12899</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;thanks will look at charts when I find my glasses&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks will look at charts when I find my glasses</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AZ Matt</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/06/05/does-obama-whdoj-policy-restrict-politicized-communications-or-not/#comment-12898</link>
		<dc:creator>AZ Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 13:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/06/05/does-obama-whdoj-policy-restrict-politicized-communications-or-not/#comment-12898</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I saw yesterday that Holder is asking a court to drop convictions for 2 Alaska legilators due to the prosecution not giving the defense all the information they had.  What was motivating these guys?  Pressure from other Republican politicians in Alaska or DC?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw yesterday that Holder is asking a court to drop convictions for 2 Alaska legilators due to the prosecution not giving the defense all the information they had.  What was motivating these guys?  Pressure from other Republican politicians in Alaska or DC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.233 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-18 00:01:02 -->

