SCOTUS: Right Wing Objections To Sotomayor In A Nutshell
Here we have the very essence, the core if you will, of right wing objections to Judge Sotomayor’s nomination. I give you the intellectual stylings and logical superiority of Judicial Watch’s Tom Fitton:
David Shuster: "What evidence do you have that she would put her feelings and politics above the rule of law?"
Tom Fitton: "Because President Obama chose her."
She was nominated by a Democratic President. Ergo, she must be unacceptable without any factual foundation as to why.
Taaaa daaaaaaaaaah.
It isn’t as though this is a shocker, given that GOP Senators fired off a letter to President Obama a while back demanding that his judicial appointments be to their conservative liking or else:
[GOP Senators] insisted that Mr. Obama begin by appointing holdover Bush nominees who were never confirmed by the Senate. There is no need to do so, and Mr. Obama should not.
The Republican senators are also demanding veto rights over nominees from their states….
It is particularly strange to see Senate Republicans raising the specter of filibustering nominees. When Mr. Bush was doing the nominating, Senator Orrin Hatch, Republican of Utah and a former Judiciary Committee chairman, warned Democrats that filibusters “mired the judicial-confirmation process in a political and constitutional crisis that undermines democracy, the judiciary, the Senate, and the Constitution.”
Do as they say at the moment, not as they used to say you should do at the top of their lungs because it no longer applies to them. So there.
Confusing? It’s meant to be. (more…)



