Because As We All Know…

self-regulation totally works:

At this point, administration officials said, they do not have a way to enforce the commitment, other than by publicizing the performance of health care providers to hold them accountable.

This is the best we can do? Seriously?!?

Because when I think health care giants, the fact that the insurance industry along with drug companies and claims firms make money by finding ways to not pay claims for insureds is totally not the first thing that comes to mind. 

Just in it for the public’s interest. Yeppers. Goodness of their golden parachute hearts and all that rot.

Next up:  war profiteers provide their own internal audits and hold themselves accountable. 

And, while we’re at it, let’s allow David Addington to critique the legal stylings of John Yoo.   Totally above-board and not self-serving kabuki at all.  

Feel the transparency and the public interest advocacy.

Oh, bipartisan village kumbaya.  You are pure magic.  Never change.

I’m all for reforms. Let’s just make sure there are safeguards built into the process to check that the "reform" isn’t actually spelled "same old, same old" scam.

And it looks like I’m not the only one with a hefty helping of skepticism today.  Ezra’s on the same page.

 
17 Responses to "Because As We All Know…"
rxbusa | Monday May 11, 2009 08:31 am 1

oh yaa. Self-promise to trim by 1.5%…that’s like filing their fingernails to them. Sorry. This is my industry and I know how they do it. It can be way better.


RevBev | Monday May 11, 2009 08:33 am 2

Is the news yukky enough? I know I am very tired…..but it all looks pretty ugly. To wit: the bombings, the torture, the Cheney, the tax loopholes and shelters. Maybe because we have turned the corner on the past 8 years (meaning I am 8 years older) the stench seems really strong with more & more being uncovered. I am glad the book salon yesterday had notes of hope and optimism.


Christy Hardin Smith | Monday May 11, 2009 08:36 am 3
In response to rxbusa @ 1

And we use their numbers as self-verification? Oh, I so totally trust that.

Mmmm hmmmmm.


foothillsmike | Monday May 11, 2009 09:13 am 4

I believe I heard where the NYS AG leveled huge penalties on a health insurance co. for paying bonuses to staffers who successfuly denied coverage to customers who really had the coverage. There were other fraudulent activities too. Sorry no linky


foothillsmike | Monday May 11, 2009 09:19 am 5

Here is another NYS investigation underway
http://www.hospitalbuyer.com/g…..raud-2134/


Christy Hardin Smith | Monday May 11, 2009 09:22 am 6
In response to foothillsmike @ 5

Given how “creative” accounting practices have become the last few years — ENRON being a prime example — I no longer trust internal number crunching without some substantial outside oversight. And even then (ENRON again being a prime example), there need to be substantial safeguards and doublechecks in place for accountability.


oldgold | Monday May 11, 2009 09:37 am 7

Hell, even big med doesn’t know how their billing $y$tem works. Recently I got into dispute over a gargantuan hospital bill with one of America’s leading hospitals. I wrangled on up thru the bureaucracy about it. They continued to threaten suit. Finally, I came to my senses and said:

“Please sue and be prepared on a quantum meruit basis to prove it.You know, the services you provide don’t come with a price tag attached. And, anything my client signed on admittance, while semi-conscious and in a gurney, I am sure the jury would be most interested in.”

Soon thereafter it was settled for about 40%. There is no reasonable basis for what they charge. They make it up. If you compare what certain procedures cost from one hospital to the next, it is eye opening.


demi | Monday May 11, 2009 09:46 am 8

My God Christy! What is that photo? I can handle your skepticism, but, Lordy, what am I supposed to do with that image?


Christy Hardin Smith | Monday May 11, 2009 10:02 am 9
In response to demi @ 8

Couldn’t figure out an appropriate pix for this one, so I went with Fellini-esque. Somehow, it just felt so right… *g*


Christy Hardin Smith | Monday May 11, 2009 10:02 am 10
In response to oldgold @ 7

Amazing how when you sit them down and force them to justify some of those charges they suddenly want to talk settlement, isn’t it? Love the quantum meruit argument. Genius.


demi | Monday May 11, 2009 10:08 am 11
In response to Christy Hardin Smith @ 9

Okay, then. It’s also comforting to know that there are worse things than death. Odd that I can feel better by something so hideous. Thanks, Christy. *g*


RevBev | Monday May 11, 2009 10:31 am 12
In response to demi @ 11

Funny, I of course had much the same reaction…..I was alittle timid though ’cause I can’t quite tell what that is at the end of the arm and pointing at us ;-))


tejanarusa | Monday May 11, 2009 01:04 pm 13

Great post, and responses. I haven’t read the “proposal”, yet, but my knee-jerk reaction to the headlines was pretty much, “yeah, right.”

oldgold – congrats for your smart approach to the hospital bills. You are so right, that they don’t know what they’re doing, that they make it up.
When my ex had spinal surgery a few years ago, though most of it was covered by insurance, he examined the bills carefully, and found a couple of instances where the same item/service was charged twice. They took those off promptly on having it pointed out.
But for folks who don’t/can’t double-check, imagine how much of that kind of thing gets through.

btw – I’m baack – (bet you didn’t notice I was missing-no don’t say anything!). My computer, in the shop for a month, turned out to be well and truly fried. Unrepairable.
This news, fortuitously, arrived a few days after a small check came for my (very small) retirement from my last employer. (I’m not officially old enough to take a distribution without penalty, so they distributed it.)
Anyway, the upshot is, I’m the happy owner of a brand-new laptop! I’ve never owned an actual new, out-of-the-box computer – always hand-me downs, or my ex used to build them himself. (He did a pretty good job, especially for the price, but there was always something that didn’t work, or not quite as it should…)

Anyway, I’ve MISSED you guys! Even when just lurking, FDL and other blogs were what kept me sane. Hard to get that benefit AND do the resume-sending, job-hunting, social networking thing in the one hour a day allowed on the library computers. (but bless the library anyway).


RevBev | Monday May 11, 2009 02:13 pm 14

O Gee: And OT: Just heard Ms. Palin called party “luminary”. Guess you have to take what you can get. Arrrgh.


john in sacramento | Monday May 11, 2009 02:18 pm 15

More of the same

Geezuz, wtf is the difference between Barack “Two Face” Obama’s policy and George “the Lesser’s” policy?

Self regulation yada, yada, yada. We’re going to look at them sternly if they “over charge.” And who decides if they over charge? We’re going to shame them into being fair? Whaaaaa???????

He expects us to believe he’s doing something in our best interest when they don’t even talk to single-payer advocates, which if given a serious platform for debate would show a savings in the billions if not hundreds of billions or trillions?

This proposal is disingenuous and duplicitous at best


4jkb4ia | Monday May 11, 2009 03:17 pm 16

Paul Krugman today. No more need be said.


allan | Monday May 11, 2009 05:37 pm 17

Of course we can trust the drug companies to self-regulate.
Because nothing says integrity like setting up fake medical journals to peddle their crappy medicines.


Sorry but the comments are closed on this post

Close