SCOTUS: Asking The Really, Really Important Questions
After Sen. Thune expressed his sexual preference SCOTUS litmus test, I couldn’t come up with a good way to express just how ludicrous it was in a succinct fashion for watercooler chitchat.
Behold, the power of snark.
Comment of the day from yesterday goes to VictorLaszlo:
How about a candidate who isn’t really gay, but experimented a little in college? Would that be acceptable to Thune, I wonder?
Think we can find a journalist to ask Thune what he’d think about a SCOTUS nominee who may have crossed over after one to many brewskis at the frat party?
Or what about a nominee who participated in the "four year plan" in college?
While we’re all worrying about the plight of the poor, white male, shouldn’t we contemplate the plight of the poor white male who has "friends with benefits" but he can’t discuss them because his bigoted political colleagues keep stuffing him back in the closet?
Honestly, how do we know we haven’t already had a gay SCOTUS justice? Not that I care, but really, how do we know? Is Thune absolutely, totally, completely and unreservedly certain we haven’t already crossed the "bridge too far?"
The ludicrosity never ends, does it.






Hi, Has he even thought he could be wrong? That I doubt. Often wrong, as they say, but never in doubt. ;-)) Always liked that. Wonder what Arlen may think he was wrong about.