Sen. Lugar To Support Dawn Johnsen — How About Your Senator?

Not to get all cocky or anything…because lord knows we can’t depend on the likes of Joe Lieberman (I-Party of One) or the newly minted Arlen Specter (D-Haggis).

But even with the jello-spined and treacherous among us, this recent bit of news on "the math" starts making the GOP Senate oppo on Dawn Johnsen look like kabuki dinner theater.

What’s this bit of good news on the Dawn Johnsen front, you ask? Let’s call it getting tougher to filibuster when people like Richard Lugar say things like this:

Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., said Tuesday he will support the nomination of an Indiana University law professor to head the Obama administration’s internal law office.

He is the first Republican to publicly declare his backing for Dawn Johnsen, whose selection to head the Office of Legal Counsel has grown into a fight about abortion rights and counterterrorism practices.

The article also mentions that Sen. Ben Nelson has said he won’t likely support Johnsen’s nomination. But I have it from a couple of well-placed sources on the Hill that Nelson intends, at least at this point, to vote FOR cloture. Which makes "the math" for GOP filibuster threats seem more tenuous, doesn’t it?

And where one GOP Senator jumps off the sinking ship, will more follow? Olympia Snowe? Judd Gregg? Susan Collins? Orrin Hatch? Who’ll be next?

Gregg made a point yesterday that applies as much to Dawn Johnsen’s nomination as it did to the Sebelius vote:

…this was slowed by obstructionist Republicans so they could fire up their base and send out a few more fundraising appeals…

Remember that article from CQ that I quoted the other day?

Social conservatives say whatever the reasons Republican senators give for opposing her nomination, Johnsen has given a boost to their troops.

“The outside groups are fired up,” said one senior Republican aide.

Welcome to Crass Coffer Cramming Kabuki Theater. It’s at someone else’s expense!

It’s well past time that Dawn Johnsen’s nomination was scheduled for a vote. Call Harry Reid’s office — (202) 224-3542 — and tell him to lead on this. Now. Also, please call your Senators and tell them to vote FOR cloture and FOR Dawn Johnsen for OLC.

And let me know what you are hearing from them. I’ll be making calls today, too, and will let you know what I hear on my end.

 
86 Responses to "Sen. Lugar To Support Dawn Johnsen — How About Your Senator?"
barbara | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:03 am 1

Dontcha love it when the tide begins to turn? (Cue “Ebb Tide.)


barbara | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:05 am 2

BearCountry | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:07 am 3

Where are the calls for the “up or down” votes that the President’s nominations deserve?


STTPinOhio | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:08 am 4

And where one GOP Senator jumps off the sinking ship, will more follow? Olympia Snowe? Judd Gregg? Susan Collins? Orrin Hatch? Who’ll be next?

Of course more will follow, because if one defection is good for Republicans, two or three would be excellent!

And clearly part of their master plan to become a national party again.


JimWhite | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:09 am 5

I was wondering yesterday how strong Haggis’ Scrapple’s opposition to Johnsen might be, and if he might do what it looks like bad Nelson is contemplating: vote for cloture but against confirmation. That seems like his best route to doing something to please both sides. The bonus is that gives us Johnsen at OLC.


jayt | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:11 am 6

Once every two or three years, Lugar will actually do something right. ‘Course, backing a fellow Hoosier isn’t exactly an ultimate act of bravery.

Still, he has broken out of his near-perpetual cipher mode, so I suppose that he’s entitled to some minimal credit.

P.S. and OT – I’m getting real damned sick of “the media” screaming at all of us to please begin wetting our collective pants immediately – and to forget about all of those pesky, past, and irrelevant torture issues.


Christy Hardin Smith | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:13 am 7

Morning all. Internet was out for a bit this morning — just now getting back on. Hate it when that happens…


libbyliberal | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:14 am 8

Thanks, Christy.

Toll free senate and congressional switchboard: 1-800-828-0498, 1-866-338-1015, 1-866-220-0044, 1-877-851-6437.


STTPinOhio | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:15 am 9

Anybody seen Norquist?

How’s that “bathtub, drowning” thing working out for him?

Maybe he meant the Republican Party, not government, would be swirling down the drain.


tjbs | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:16 am 10

Concerning arlin.
It’s easy to talk the talk
I judge him when I see him walk the walk


SouthernDragon | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:16 am 11
In response to JimWhite @ 5

Hey, hey. That’s an insult to scrapple.


Christy Hardin Smith | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:16 am 12

And folks, please do make calls today. I’ve been hearing from staffers that the fact that Senators are getting calls on this is getting noticed. In some offices quite a bit.

Thanks heaps for all the effort so far. I really appreciate it!


Leen | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:18 am 13

thanks Christy will call again.

Specter does not support the Dawn Johnson nomination. Specter against the Employee free choice act.


Christy Hardin Smith | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:19 am 14
In response to JimWhite @ 5

Specter hasn’t yet said one way or the other what his cloture vote will be. I’m wondering about that, too…


foothillsmike | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:19 am 15

Was surprised yesterday when Sam Brownback (R Kansas) voted for Sebelious but she was from his home state. Could the Lugar endorsement be the same thing?


WarOnWarOff | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:19 am 16

MC Steele’s little boo hoo rant about Cornhole sticking his neck out for Haggis yesterday makes me think this kabuki dinner show is OVER.


barbara | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:20 am 17

Do you suppose that came up in his tete-a-tete with Obama this morning? *g*


Christy Hardin Smith | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:21 am 18
In response to foothillsmike @ 15

Most likely that has a lot to do with it. But the GOP has been pushing for unanimity on this one — to have Lugar publicly break ranks now undercuts that push quite a bit. (she types hopefully)


JimWhite | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:21 am 19
In response to foothillsmike @ 15

There’s probably a hefty dose of that. Pat Roberts also voted for Sebelius. I’m sure they’ll vote no on both cloture and confirmation for Johnsen because of their anti-abortion rabidness. Note that Specter did vote for confirmation of Sebelius. If he were still facing Toomey in a primary, would he have been able to do that?


jayt | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:21 am 20
In response to Leen @ 13

Specter against the Employee free choice act.

That’s ok – it’s not like PA Democrats need any support from PA labor, or anything.

They’re gonna love him.

/s


cbl2 | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:22 am 21
In response to foothillsmike @ 15

and isn’t there a personal connection between Johnsen and Lee Hamilton ??


barbara | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:23 am 22
In response to JimWhite @ 19

Do you know the confirmation vote total? If you have to look it up, I can look it up!


barbara | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:25 am 23
In response to barbara @ 22

65 to 31.


foothillsmike | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:25 am 24
In response to barbara @ 22

65 to 31


JimWhite | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:26 am 25
In response to barbara @ 22

I’m pretty sure it was 65-31. When I looked at the individual votes (senate.gov and click on “votes”), I saw that no D’s voted “no”. The interesting (to me) R “yes” votes were Collins, Snowe, and Voinovich. They’ve all been with us on a number of important votes so far, along with Scrapple.


barbara | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:26 am 26
In response to foothillsmike @ 24

jinx!


foothillsmike | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:27 am 27
In response to cbl2 @ 21

Dawn Johnson is married to Judge Hamilton’s brother – they are the nephews of Lee Hamilton.


Adie | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:27 am 28

Good Morn Christy and Pups.

Don’tcha just love it when the pubbles dig in their heels and cover their eyes, stomp their feet and dog knows what else, then dare blame Obama for not having accomplished anything achieved that precious 60-vote mark.

I shall not contact Voinovichy any more. He’d only use it as an excuse to march doubletime heading away from progress. A soft-spoken thug who routinely jams the gears of progress and humane policiy is no less a thug. The only thing one can say for Vichy, he’s consistent. If it costs money, it must be bad. His mattress must be a sight to behold, with all those little scraps of bills sticking out of the seams. idgit.

I shall not contact Sherrod Brown either, except to thank him for his tireless, savvy, good-hearted service. He’s a self-starter, definitely a keeper. ;->


Christy Hardin Smith | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:29 am 29
In response to Adie @ 28

Last I heard from Brown’s office, they hadn’t made any decision on support. So a call to him would be useful if you have the time.


barbara | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:30 am 30
In response to JimWhite @ 25

Thanks. Being a plugger, I plodded through the NYTimes, forgetting about the senate.gov access.


Adie | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:31 am 31
In response to Christy Hardin Smith @ 7

Hi Redd. Dang the toobz! Full speed ahead!

I’m curious. Did the toobz act up yesterday also? We were having an awful time getting FDL, or much of anything, to load for quite awhile (pc mozilla).


Christy Hardin Smith | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:32 am 32
In response to Adie @ 31

I had no problems yesterday. The problem this morning for me was with my local cable service, not FDL — I couldn’t get online at all from here for a while.


AZ Matt | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:33 am 33

Kyl & McCain are the kids I am stuck with.


STTPinOhio | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:34 am 34

Arlen’s between a rock and a hard place.

He needs the Dems far more than they need him.

60 seats was only a matter of time, anyway.

What’s he gonna do if he’s unhappy, go back to the Republicans?

No, they’ll let him prattle on about being an ‘independent thinker’ but he’ll have to play ball most of the time.

Besides, as many others here have pointed out, it’s no lock that he will make it out of the Dem primary either.


Christy Hardin Smith | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:36 am 35
In response to AZ Matt @ 33

Sorry about that — Kyl’s been a bit of a jerk about this. But it might be worth a reminder to both of them what they have said previously about filibustering presidential appointments. I have found some satisfactory sputtering can occur when you quote back their own words and ask why the hypocrisy now. *g*


Adie | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:36 am 36

Thanks for the heads-up. Will do. Brown will listen and, if he’s wavering or looking for a nudge, it’ll help. I’ll get right on it.

Quite seriously, for the past several years, although I have kept the language properly respectful et al, I’ve ratcheted up the pressure so much on Vichy, he’d probably take any kind of nudge from my direction as a worthy excuse to run the other way out of spite.


Adie | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:38 am 37

An army marches on its stomach. Have a delicious muffin and an extra cuppa on me. ;->


STTPinOhio | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:38 am 38

You’ve gotta love it; they lose Specter yesterday, and who is on MSNBC this morning?

The Dick Armey.

What, Newtie and Darth weren’t available?

Talk about being politically tone deaf.


alank | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:39 am 39

“…kabuki dinner theater”

Now, that’s funny!


barbara | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:40 am 40
In response to Adie @ 36

We had this problem with Norm and also with Rep. (but not really) John Kline. I sometimes wonder where the fine line lies.


Christy Hardin Smith | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:41 am 41
In response to STTPinOhio @ 38

I got so pissed last week. Wolf Blitzer had Armey on to talk about the economy and didn’t bother to ask him any follow-up at all whatsoever after Armey pratteled on and on about the “Tea Party” crap. Jeebus, is it too much to ask that people have to point out personal conflicts of interest up front or that journalists point them out if they don’t because people need to know that there is a monetary interest between Armey’s bottom line and playing up this crap?

Some days, I despair of people ever buying a fricking clue.


twolf1 | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:42 am 42
In response to STTPinOhio @ 38

well, CNN had Fred Thompson on this AM to grade Obama’s 100 day performance. “prosecuting past administration will make us like a 3rd world nation.”


Christy Hardin Smith | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:42 am 43
In response to Adie @ 37

Thank you, but I had some multi-grain porridge with ground flaxseed, sliced banana and a sprinkling of dark chocolate chips this morning already. Trying to eat healthier and pop in some extra antioxidants where I can.

And it was seriously nummy.


barbara | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:43 am 44
In response to twolf1 @ 42

(((spewing coffee))) Peter Principle Poster Person.


Christy Hardin Smith | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:44 am 45
In response to twolf1 @ 42

Was Grandpa Fred wearing that lovely green hard hat ensemble again? That was serious prune-level stylin’…


WarOnWarOff | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:44 am 46
In response to twolf1 @ 42

Did he yell at the clouds too?


foothillsmike | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:44 am 47

Sen Michael Bennet’s office was taking comments but said he has not yet taken a position but she would pass my comments along


Christy Hardin Smith | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:45 am 48

Ahhhhhhh…the iPod just popped on Joni Mitchell’s “Big Yellow Taxi.” Some songs just make you smile every time.


oldgold | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:45 am 49

On matters such as this where there is no overwhelming principle at stake, there is no excuse for a Democratic Senator not to vote for cloture. They can protect their miserable asses by voting no on the nomination.


Christy Hardin Smith | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:45 am 50
In response to alank @ 39

Thank you — I was particularly pleased with that one myself. hehehehehe


twolf1 | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:46 am 51
In response to WarOnWarOff @ 46

Doesn’t he always?

Sadly, no green hat.


STTPinOhio | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:47 am 52

I got so pissed last week. Wolf Blitzer had Armey on to talk about the economy and didn’t bother to ask him any follow-up at all whatsoever after Armey pratteled on and on about the “Tea Party” crap.

I wonder, is the ability to let your eyes glaze over as people you interview say patently ridiculous shit an acquired skill, or something you’re born with?


Christy Hardin Smith | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:47 am 53
In response to foothillsmike @ 47

Thanks much — appreciate the update and the call. :)


STTPinOhio | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:49 am 54
In response to twolf1 @ 42

not prosecuting past administration will make us like a 3rd world nation.”

Fixed it for Fred.


jayt | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:49 am 55
In response to foothillsmike @ 47

My experience w/ calling Bayh’s office is always like that. There have been times when a vote was literally minutes away, and according to staff, “Senator Bayh has not taken any position on this matter as yet.”


demi | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:50 am 56

I get disappointed watching so called interviews without any follow up questions, too. But, since there’s only a few folks in media who actually have a conversation with a guest – Bill Moyer, Rachel Maddow – that’s just how they work. They just plan for a few sound bites and move on to the next story. It’s about agendas not actual information.
Am lurking this am. Got kinda scared and weirded out reading Morning Swim.
But, people here on your post are doing well. Thank you all.


Christy Hardin Smith | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:52 am 57

Also, if everyone could take a little time to push Harry Reid’s office today, I’d really appreciate it.


Christy Hardin Smith | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:53 am 58
In response to jayt @ 55

Bayh may be the poster child for “tepid.”


jayt | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:55 am 59

and I forgot my self-imposed rule for Bayh references:

Evan Bayh (D-?-IN)

there.


mui1 | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:56 am 60
In response to jayt @ 20

Ugh. Arlen Spector. To hear Joe Lieberman “welcoming” him to the democratic party as if Joe didn’t get kicked out of the party by local Ct dems!?! Speaking of which, I wonder if Pennsylvania democrats would be willing to accept Arlen Spector as their democratic nominee in a no contest primary, because Joe and Obama said it’s a good thing. I know I wouldn’t.

Anyway whatever happened to the time when Joe Lieberman said everyone should just shut up and let the president choose his own people? Oh! I guess Lieberman was referring to Bush.


tjbs | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:57 am 61
In response to STTPinOhio @ 34

Hasn’t fast Eddie (D) ,our Gov promised no primary challenge as one of the conditions for jumping ship?.


Adie | Wednesday April 29, 2009 06:59 am 62
In response to STTPinOhio @ 38

Hey! They’re running outta red meat for the table. Heh. Tough old geezers wheezers, once removed, not so much. Well, la tee dah! *g*


wigwam | Wednesday April 29, 2009 07:00 am 63

I’m looking forward to the Republicans becoming ”The Party of Convictions.” ;-)


mui1 | Wednesday April 29, 2009 07:00 am 64

Bernie sanders was on Ed Schultz (?) saying Sebelius was not for single payer healthcare and it would have to be a grass roots movement. Sanders didn’t sound really overjoyed over the Arlen switch.


Adie | Wednesday April 29, 2009 07:03 am 65

#58 & #59 Christy and Jayt! heh. u wanna add Voinovichy to that lil’ pile there? Be my guest.

I e-mailed Sherrod Brown. His site was a bit clunky. Mebbe I had company. Goody! Now let’s hope he behaves himself. His wife’s very active also, so mebbe she’ll nudge him effectively also. war is heqq.


cbl2 | Wednesday April 29, 2009 07:07 am 66
In response to mui1 @ 64

POTUS finally met with Progressive Caucus yesterday. prior to the meeting they had stated single payer/public option as their ‘line in the sand’. haven’t seen reporting on this – probably due to the all Specter, all the time deluge


mui1 | Wednesday April 29, 2009 07:08 am 67
In response to STTPinOhio @ 34

I’m going to guess that “moderate” democrats feel they need Arlen.


mui1 | Wednesday April 29, 2009 07:09 am 68
In response to cbl2 @ 66

line in sand?


Adie | Wednesday April 29, 2009 07:09 am 69
In response to wigwam @ 63

as in convicted? conflicted? conflagration-hated? conbusted?


cbl2 | Wednesday April 29, 2009 07:09 am 70

Pennsylvania Firedogs –

has Casey’s Office taken a stand ?


MrWhy | Wednesday April 29, 2009 07:10 am 71

May I suggest that people thank Sen. Lugar for doing the right thing on the Johnsen nomination?


cbl2 | Wednesday April 29, 2009 07:11 am 72
In response to mui1 @ 68

The Congressional Progressive Democratic Caucus are prepared not to back down on this essential part of health care reform, and they’re planning to let President Obama know that health care reform without the public option will NOT get their backing.

link!


Adie | Wednesday April 29, 2009 07:14 am 73
In response to mui1 @ 60

That’s a hoot!?! Liarman welcoming Arlen to, um, nowheresville? whut th’ heh.

Dear Liarmush: Out means OUT, OUTSIDE, d-i-v-o-r-c-e! cah-peach?


twolf1 | Wednesday April 29, 2009 07:16 am 74

mui1 | Wednesday April 29, 2009 07:17 am 75
In response to cbl2 @ 72

Merci! I was worried for a minute, because I get confused by idioms. And sometimes make mincemeat out of them.


selise | Wednesday April 29, 2009 07:17 am 76
In response to mui1 @ 68

from pnhp:

The progressives in the House of Representatives have stated that they “will only support comprehensive health care reform legislation which includes a public plan option on a level playing field with private health insurance plans.” (http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/index.cfm?ContentID=351&ParentID=0&SectionID=66&SectionTree=66&lnk=b&ItemID=349)

The Republicans will not support a government-run plan that competes “unfairly” with the private health plans. Specifically, they will not support a Medicare-like option.

But look at the wording of the statement from the Progressive Caucus. The public plan option must be “on a level playing field with the private plans.” The model that meets that definition is a PPO that is sponsored by the government but administered by private insurers, with a firewall separating the PPO from the government. Thus the government option will be simply another PPO, with all of its perverseness, competing in a market of private plans. The line in the sand drawn by the Progressive Caucus was washed away by their carefully worded release.

the hcan guy was here awhile ago flogging for an insurance centered plan (he may be a very nice guy but he has no clue what he’s talking about) and he pointed me to a paper on very general ideas on how this might work. the regulation required was more opaque/complicated than anything i’ve heard from geithner (and therefore ripe for being gamed by the insurance lobby). there’s lots more i could say, but the thread isn’t on health care.


Adie | Wednesday April 29, 2009 07:18 am 77
In response to MrWhy @ 71

agreed. Most important. Don’t let them only hear angry yelling. the kudos are golden. Think how you’d feel, folks.


mui1 | Wednesday April 29, 2009 07:20 am 78
In response to cbl2 @ 72

Bernie Sanders/Schultz talked about the senate and Arlen not being big on single payer healthcare.


mui1 | Wednesday April 29, 2009 07:24 am 79
In response to selise @ 76

But look at the wording of the statement from the Progressive Caucus. The public plan option must be “on a level playing field with the private plans.” The model that meets that definition is a PPO that is sponsored by the government but administered by private insurers, with a firewall separating the PPO from the government. Thus the government option will be simply another PPO, with all of its perverseness, competing in a market of private plans. The line in the sand drawn by the Progressive Caucus was washed away by their carefully worded release.

Doesn’t sound very progressive.


Leen | Wednesday April 29, 2009 07:26 am 80
In response to wigwam @ 63

Party of convicts


selise | Wednesday April 29, 2009 07:35 am 81
In response to mui1 @ 79

it’s not. but the insurance lobby is a big deal to the dems. i don’t know why else would so many “progressive” organizations and people would all of a sudden stop talking about single payer unless it came from the top down?

from david sirota in 2006:

News Flash – America Wants a Single-Payer Health Care System

Kevin Drum at the Washington Monthly takes the DLC to task for – shocker – not supporting the concept of a single-payer, government-sponsored health care system in America. Drum argues that Democrats have lacked the courage to stand up for such a proposal. He’s probably right – they fear the wrath of the health insurance companies. But make no mistake about it – the public would be with Democrats if they had the guts to push single-payer. As an ABC News/Washington Post poll showed in 2003, the majority of Americans support a single-payer, government-sponsored health care system, even when they hear the right-wing’s alarmist arguments.

the people may want it but the pols don’t.

kudos to schultz and sanders. i’m going to look for a podcast of that show. thanks for the heads up.


musicsleuth | Wednesday April 29, 2009 07:38 am 82

Called Casey’s office — he has no official position on the Dawn Johnsen nomination. The person I talked to made a point of saying that he didn’t approve all of Obama’s nominees. When I expressed my support for Johnsen, he made sure to tell me that he *did* support 75% of them….

Definitely worth a call to Casey. Probably getting lots of calls from the anti-choice nuts.


STTPinOhio | Wednesday April 29, 2009 08:52 am 83
In response to tjbs @ 61

Hasn’t fast Eddie (D) ,our Gov promised no primary challenge as one of the conditions for jumping ship?.

He sure has but, other than allocating resources, can he really enforce that?


ally | Wednesday April 29, 2009 09:28 am 84
In response to mui1 @ 60

NO. PA Dems will not support Senator Arlen Narcissist.

Locally a lot of PA Dems are hoping for Senator Sestak.


Leen | Wednesday April 29, 2009 09:31 am 85
In response to STTPinOhio @ 83

Can a Governor do that?


MrWhy | Wednesday April 29, 2009 12:23 pm 86

What pdaly said:

From Leahy’s letter to Bybee: You [Bybee] were nominated by President George W. Bush to serve as head of OLC on September 4, 2001. You were confirmed on October 23,2001.

pdaly wonders: By comparison, how long has Dawn Johnsen been waiting to hear since Obama nominated her January 05, 2009?


Sorry but the comments are closed on this post

Close