Spring Planting In The White House Garden
Restoring Justice: Was Stevens The Exception Or The Rule?

Is The GOP’s Pissing Match On Legal Nominations Getting Uglier?

It doesn’t take a whiz (*rim shot here*) to see the GOP strategy on legal nominations.

With a threat to filibuster Dawn Johnsen’s nomination to OLC, the Harold Koh smearing, and now Indiana judge David Hamilton, Specter has become the point man for GOP piss and moan

Which is exactly what Specter wants, given his upcoming primary fight with hard-right opponent Pat Toomey. Can you say posturing for the rabid primary base?  Specter, the only Republican in the room beyond Sen. Richard Lugar who was there sponsoring fellow Hoosier Hamilton’s nomination, got his ten minutes of camera time at the hearing and then left. Classy.

Anyone think this is simply a good faith moment of conscience for the GOP?  Because I’m sensing some serious dung throwing in the offing.

And so is Nan Aron of AFJ:

A few weeks ago, all 41 Republican Senators sent a letter to President Obama , threatening that they will use filibusters to prevent majority votes on any nominee who will not rule based on the political agenda of the Republican senator from their home state.

But will this whine, grumble and obstruct strategy work?

Aides on the Judiciary committee suggested to me that there are two troubling signs. First: The inability of Harry Reid and Mitch McConnell to reach an agreement on a time for a floor debate and vote on Johnsen’s nomination (Reid spokeswoman Regan LaChapelle emailed to say "we are working to get an agreement to consider the nomination, and we hope to do so as soon as possible.") And second: Sen. Arlen Specter has said he’d withhold judgment on Johnsen’s nomination until he meets with her personally.

Call your Senators today. Tell them the rule of law is not something they should game.  And that you will be watching what they do. 

Especially the ones who just a few short months ago were bitching up one side and down the other about an "up-or-down vote."

If your Senator tends to be a conservative Dem, it is especially important to call.  Dems hold 56 seats, there are two independents and the GOP holds 41 — several of the GOP votes are in flux, which means the GOP needs to peel off a few conservative Dems to have a solid shot at preventing cloture. I’d like that not to happen.

Over the two week Easter recess, try to get some face time with your Senators if they are holding any public meetings near you and give them a piece of your mind.

I don’t know about the rest of you, but I’ve had it with showboating over substance. And I’m all ears on ideas on how to combat this.

NOTE: We’ll have a live chat this afternoon at 3 pm ET/noon PT with folks from the Brennan Center for Justice about restoring the rule of law and some of the issues that have come up with legal nominations thus far. Hope you can join us!

  Spotlight
64 Responses to "Is The GOP’s Pissing Match On Legal Nominations Getting Uglier?"
Elliott | Thursday April 9, 2009 05:53 am 1

To the phones!

Morning Christy.
Thanks for setting up another great chat for this afternoon.


Millineryman | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:00 am 2

Good morning. The hammer is pounding away. Go Christy.


dakine01 | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:05 am 3

Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:07 am 4

Morning all — how is everyone this morning? Thought you all would get a kick out of the pix. *G*


Twain | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:12 am 5
In response to Christy Hardin Smith @ 4

Morning, Christy. Nice pix. How like the GOP to leave their “stuff” in the middle of the road !


cbl2 | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:13 am 6

Good Morning Christy and Firedogs,

same sh*, different day . . .

taking a short trip in the way-back machine – something almost indentical happened after Rove publicly threatened Specter with loss of his then Chair – can’t remember the exact machinations (Roberts ? Alito ? torture ?) but it was the same choreography

1-2 cha-cha-cha, 3-4 . . .


klynn | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:14 am 7

I would start a campaign that this is all about torture and protecting torturers. And that those who are obstructing the vote will not be viewed by the public kindly.

I bet an appropriate polling on this matter would be interesting outcome-wise. Probably put the GOP at an all time low in terms of confidence with the public.


bobpine | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:15 am 8

This just say “NO” and the eternal posturing of these people is really getting beyond being old,its getting downright silly.


Leen | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:16 am 9

More solid evidence that when it comes to justice the Republicans need lies under oath having to do with blow jobs to investigate to get their justice juices flowing. Revealing and oh so pathetic

Such a collective effort to block someone as dedicated to justice as Dawn Johnson demonstrates once again that the Republican EMPERORS HAVE NO CLOTHES. That image is just too disturbing. Sorry for that.

Thanks Christy …. We are watching pushing , emailing doing our part. The big question is will they do their part? Will call


Millineryman | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:18 am 10
In response to Christy Hardin Smith @ 4

Honestly afraid to get out from under the covers.


Leen | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:21 am 11
In response to Millineryman @ 10

You can make phone calls from “under the covers”. You can even use that as a description to the folks who answer those phones in D.C.


PJ70 | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:22 am 12

AmeriKablog will censor your posts if you call them out for whining about not getting their share of Progressive fund raising money. You can swear if you want. You can bash gays if you want. Don’t dare question their patriotism for wanting their share of the money. Show me the money, that’s what it’s all about, isn’t it?

Peace?


cbl2 | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:23 am 13

coupling this with the especially puerile crap they’re pulling with freshmen Dems in the house – who says the Republics don’t have a plan ?!?

p.s. what I wouldn’t give to see them try this crap with Alan Grayson – pay-per-view city !


foothillsmike | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:23 am 14

Morning All,
Don’t think we have an ambassador to Iraq yet either. General Odierno is crying for help and Obama’s nominee is a career State Department Person. All of the blocked nominees should be listed out to show the cumulative effect of rethug obstructionism.


Kassandra | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:23 am 15

Too bad they didn’t see their way clear to filibuster Giethner…….


cattbutt | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:24 am 16

i can only assume the republicans will get what they want in the end.

they always do.


Bluetoe2 | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:24 am 17
In response to bobpine @ 8

Given the weak leadership of the Democrats in the Senate Republican, obstructionism is effective.


azportsider | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:26 am 18

“Call your Senators today. Tell them the rule of law is not something they should game. And that you will be watching what they do.”

Won’t have much effect here, I’m afraid, Christy. My senators are the worthless McCain and Chief Obstructionist John Kyl. The latter thinks the rule of law is for gaming, while the former has been on so many sides of every issue that nobody knows what he stands for.


Leen | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:29 am 19
In response to klynn @ 7

Ot..Klynn Amy will be in your neck of the jungle tomorrow.

edu/email/filtering/
X-PMX-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report=’BLOGSPOT_URI 0.5, BODY_PARA_IS_SENTENCE_URL 0.1, KNOWN_FREEWEB_URI 0.05, BODY_SIZE_10000_PLUS 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __FRAUD_419_LOC 0, __HAS_HTML 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HTML_FONT_BLUE 0, __KNOWN_FREEWEB_URI1 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __OEM_PRICE 0, __RATWARE_SIGNATURE_3_N1 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __STOCK_PHRASE_7 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __USER_AGENT 0′

Corporations-Democracy
————————————————————————————-
NOTE: This is an email message service on the “relationship between democracy and corporations,” with an emphasis on Ohio. The goal is to send a maximum of 2-3 messages per week — thereby increasing the chance that the message will be read, reflected on and, if need be, acted on. It you wish not to receive these postings, please email gcoleridge@afsc.org . Please encourage others to sign up! Thanks, Greg Coleridge
More information: http://www.afsc.net/ejcorpdem
Cuss, discuss, rants and raves are welcome at our NEW blog “Create Real Democracy”
http://createrealdemocracy.blogspot.com/
————————————————————————————–

Amy Goodman Coming to 4 Ohio Communities

Amy Goodman, host of the acclaimed daily TV/radio program Democracy Now, will speak in 4 Ohio communities on Friday, April 10 (schedule below). If you live anywhere near Athens, Columbus, Kent or Cleveland, please consider hearing one of the nation’s leading independent media voices on peace, justice and democracy.

—————————-

April 9, 2009
Athens, OH
Award-winning journalist Amy Goodman, host of the daily, grassroots, global, radio/TV news hour Democracy Now!, is on a national speaking tour to mark DN!’s 13th anniversary and launch her third book with journalist David Goodman, Standing Up to the Madness: Ordinary Heroes in Extraordinary Times.

WHEN: 4pm
WHERE: EW Scripps School of Journalism, Ohio University, Park Place & Court Street
DESCRIPTION: TBA
TICKETS: TBA

April 10, 2009
Columbus, OH
Award-winning journalist Amy Goodman, host of the daily, grassroots, global, radio/TV news hour Democracy Now!, is on a national speaking tour to mark DN!’s 13th anniversary and launch her third book with journalist David Goodman, Standing Up to the Madness: Ordinary Heroes in Extraordinary Times.

WHEN: 12pm
WHERE: First Unitarian Universalist Church, 93 W. Weisheimer Rd, Columbus, OH 43214
DESCRIPTION: Benefit for Columbus Community Radio, WCRS
TICKETS: Suggested $10 donation at the door


Leen | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:29 am 20
In response to Leen @ 19

sorry about that other stuff


WarOnWarOff | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:32 am 21

Cornyn and Hutchison here. Ugh.

Hey, here’s some good news from Texas (for a change)…

San Marcos — Hays County Commissioners on Tuesday rescinded a contract for engineering design on the first portion of the San Marcos Loop that they had previously awarded to KBR.

On a motion by Pct. 1 Commissioner Debbie Gonzales Ingalsbe, the court decided to give the contract to S&B Infrastructure LTD.

The move came one week after Iraq War veterans Gregory Foster and Bryan Hannah spoke of the company’s record in that country in less than glowing terms.

In making her motion, Ingalsbe noted that the commissioners “need to be good stewards” of taxpayer money. In remarks before the meeting, she noted a “number of concerns” that residents had brought up in phone calls and e-mails. “Certainly the court holds the responsibility to listen to concerns of our constituents in determining what’s best for our community.”

http://www.sanmarcosrecord.com…..11449.html


Petrocelli | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:32 am 22
In response to Christy Hardin Smith @ 4

I thought Repugs fell out of a Horse’s Ass …

G’Morning Christy


demi | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:34 am 23
In response to Millineryman @ 10

I hear ya, friend. Some days it seems like we are bailing a sinking ship with tea spoons.
(Any more surprises in you yard?)


cbl2 | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:35 am 24
In response to foothillsmike @ 14

once upon a time Bully Pulpit wasn’t a pejorative -

don’t understand why POTUS doesn’t take his poll numbers out for a spin and call these bitches on their bullsh*

and where in bloody hell is Evan we-don’t-have-an-agenda Bayh on David Hamilton ?!?


alank | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:35 am 25

I pine for the days when Congress met about 3 months out of the year and otherwise led as normal lives as possible for most people.

Interesting scatologic, tho.


Petrocelli | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:36 am 26
In response to cbl2 @ 24

Yep, Bush was a big bully with lower approval ratings … great at twisting arms and circumventing the process to get his way.


Kassandra | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:37 am 27
In response to cattbutt @ 16

Esp when they have 10 Blue Dawgs in their corner. The Dem to Repub % ain’t all it;’s cracked up to be, I think mos t people believe that means the Dems vote for Obama’s policies. That just is not so, more and more all the time.


klynn | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:38 am 28
In response to Leen @ 19

Thanks! This is great!

The other day, I linked to her book tour calendar after seeing her and Glenn on Bill Moyers. Wish they were touring together.

Mr. klynn is going to take me on a lunch date to hear her! I hope many turn out. He understands she is one of my heroes (after him of course!).


AZ Matt | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:39 am 29
In response to Christy Hardin Smith @ 4

I could use that poop in my garden.


alank | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:40 am 30
In response to cattbutt @ 16

I like the moniker. Talk to the butt! That’s what cats say.


Pade | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:40 am 31

How about recess appointments for some of these people? I forget the timeline afterward but with some work we will have more Dem Senators after the 2010 elections. I think Spector is toast in Pa no matter what he does between now and then. Having blown off the Unions there are not enough far right wingnuts to elect him even if he gets through the primary and Toomey hasn’t a prayer if he wins the primary.


klynn | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:41 am 32
In response to AZ Matt @ 29

The elephants at our zoo fling their poop at certain people/visitors based on how they are dressed. Those creatures have amazing aim!


klynn | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:43 am 33
In response to klynn @ 32

What shocked us is that they seemed to know to fling fresh piles at the women and hard dried piles at the men. Pain for men – mess for women. Absolutely amazing to see!


demi | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:44 am 34

Other than phone calls, I have no suggestions today. I would feel more encouraged if our reps actually gave a *Shit* about whether we are watching or not, and what we think.


Petrocelli | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:44 am 35
In response to Pade @ 31

Haggis is great at playing both sides for favors, as good as HoJo at this.

As for recess appointments, I’m sure Harry Reid won’t allow them … doesn’t want to tick off his BFFAE, yannow …


PJ70 | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:45 am 36

hypocrite
One entry found.

Main Entry:
hyp·o·crite Listen to the pronunciation of hypocrite
Pronunciation:
ˈhi-pə-ˌkrit
Function:
noun
Etymology:
Middle English ypocrite, from Anglo-French, from Late Latin hypocrita, from Greek hypokritēs actor, hypocrite, from hypokrinesthai
Date:
13th century

1 : a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion
2 : a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings
3 : Americablog


Leen | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:46 am 37

Your image above made me think of scene in one of Jim Carey’s films where he is birthed out of Rhino or something

Jim Carey being birthed or something.. Republicans need a rebirth or something
http://noolmusic.com/myspace_v….._birth.php

(Christy worth the watch. Sure you could use the clip of Carey coming out of a Rhino for one of your creative post)


Millineryman | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:48 am 38
In response to demi @ 23

Kind of but I’m not going to worry too much about it. This time I know who it was and will deal with them appropriately.


Petrocelli | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:52 am 39
In response to PJ70 @ 36

LOL


Petrocelli | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:53 am 40
In response to Leen @ 37

Ace Ventura … When Nature Calls

The look on the tourists’ faces is priceless !


PJ70 | Thursday April 9, 2009 06:53 am 41

Hell hath no fury like a progressive censored!

hypocrite
One entry found.

Main Entry:
hyp·o·crite Listen to the pronunciation of hypocrite
Pronunciation:
ˈhi-pə-ˌkrit
Function:
noun
Etymology:
Middle English ypocrite, from Anglo-French, from Late Latin hypocrita, from Greek hypokritēs actor, hypocrite, from hypokrinesthai
Date:
13th century

1 : a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion
2 : a person who acts in contradiction to his or her stated beliefs or feelings
3 : Americablog


Leen | Thursday April 9, 2009 07:03 am 42
In response to Petrocelli @ 40

The faces on the family are “priceless” . I think this is the face of the public when it comes to the lack of response to the publics outrage

That clip just rips up my insides. This would be a great clip for someone to use. Just who would be being birthed…I am not sure.


sojourner | Thursday April 9, 2009 07:05 am 43

I have no idea what it would cost to do this — but what about buying ad space in select major newspapers? I could probably come up with a few $$ to help with the cause…


foothillsmike | Thursday April 9, 2009 07:06 am 44

Refreshing sure is a chore this AM. Involves detour into hinterland.


Leen | Thursday April 9, 2009 07:09 am 45
In response to klynn @ 32

or the way they smell…male female


MrWhy | Thursday April 9, 2009 07:17 am 46

How about an “Oh, grow up” campaign? Nope, too many Dems that applies to.


barbara | Thursday April 9, 2009 07:19 am 47

Parallel track. Lean on Coleman, Pawlenty, RNC, and pundits with pulpits (Olbermann, Stewart, Maddow) to raise the noise level about seating Al Franken.

This whole appointment mess reminds me yet again about my lack of representation in the U.S. Senate, and how essential it is to the other 49 states that this happen NOW.


barbara | Thursday April 9, 2009 07:21 am 48
In response to cattbutt @ 16

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! This. Must. Stop. Now. If we keep believing it, we enable it.


Petrocelli | Thursday April 9, 2009 07:23 am 49
In response to barbara @ 48

Hear ! Hear !

BTW, didja get my e-mail yesterday ?


barbara | Thursday April 9, 2009 07:30 am 50
In response to Petrocelli @ 49

Just did. More on that later. :-)


bobpine | Thursday April 9, 2009 07:33 am 51
In response to Bluetoe2 @ 17

I have to agree with you.


foothillsmike | Thursday April 9, 2009 07:37 am 52

Christy love your picture but do you have a picture of a chicken shitting so we envision the dem leadership?


barbara | Thursday April 9, 2009 07:43 am 53
In response to foothillsmike @ 52

Petrocelli | Thursday April 9, 2009 07:54 am 54
In response to barbara @ 53

FOTFL


MrWhy | Thursday April 9, 2009 07:54 am 55
In response to klynn @ 32

got a video of that?


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 9, 2009 07:57 am 56
In response to PJ70 @ 12

We don’t get our share of it either — and this blog doesn’t exactly run for free, given server and other costs as well as programming needs that we don’t get for free. The reason John is bitching is because constantly being asked to give shit away for free without a commensurate interest being paid in funding grassroots and online messaging outlets is both short-sighted and stupid.

And progressive institutions ought to know that. So should readers of blogs.

You think I can feed my family or buy my child clothing or pay for my doctor’s appointments for free just because I devote my time away from my family to pushing for liberal causes? Nope. Strangely doctors and grocery stores and other vendors don’t give a crap how lovely my motives might be when my wallet is empty.

The thought that progressive bloggers who have been carrying a lot of the load for messaging on issues that matter can keep going when the ads are thin like they are now in this down economy just on grins and prayers is ludicrous.

Why is it that the right wing seems to understand the need for infrastructure, but people on the left think anyone who is doing work on issues that matter to us ought to be starving and grateful for being poor? Honestly, if Mr. ReddHedd didn’t have a good job, I’d never be able to afford to work the hours I do on this blog and on the issues that matter to me and survive. And it’s worse for local blogs whose work on local races and political issues is vital in a lot of cases.

Instead of turning your bile at Aravosis, why not ask yourself if you’ve donated to a progressive blog lately? Because far too many of them have had to go dark the last few months due to financial constraints. And if we all end up having to do that, who exactly is going to fight back for better legal appointments? Or economic messaging that progressive?

Stop and think about that for a moment.


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 9, 2009 07:58 am 57
In response to AZ Matt @ 29

Me, too — LOL.


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 9, 2009 08:01 am 58

btw, sorry to have missed the bulk of the thread this morning, gang — the FIL and I sneaked over to Mr. ReddHedd’s office this morning for a surprise birthday party for him.

After much cake and laughs, am back home again…


Petrocelli | Thursday April 9, 2009 08:09 am 59

Well Done !

Happy Birthday Mr. Redd !!!


tejanarusa | Thursday April 9, 2009 08:25 am 60
In response to WarOnWarOff @ 21

Yay! All those DFH’s in Hays County/San Marcos! (for non-Texans, right between Austin and San Antonio, liberal/Dem oases of Texas)


klynn | Thursday April 9, 2009 08:33 am 61
In response to MrWhy @ 55

I wish. It happened so fast I could not get the camera out fast enough to capture it. But it was quite funny.

The elephant keeper explained that after years of collecting notes on the behavior, they were able to narrow the response to specific dress.


tejanarusa | Thursday April 9, 2009 08:36 am 62

Obviously, I’m way late to the thread – but if anyne’s here who knows – why do Reid and McConnell have to agree on a time for a vote? I never noticed that when the Repubs were running things. In fact, they ran things – we seem to have to everything by consensus – with people who will never agree with us on anything.


Cheryl | Thursday April 9, 2009 10:24 am 63

Thanks Christy for everything you do. Called my sens and congressman. Hope it helps!


RevBev | Friday April 10, 2009 05:15 am 64

The picture really is funny and a mess. I loved it more yesterday; alittle harder to take first thing in the morning ;) Good Morning, All.


Sorry but the comments are closed on this post
Restoring Justice: Was Stevens The Exception Or The Rule?
Spring Planting In The White House Garden

Close