Will GOP Stage Paltry Showboat On Dawn Johnsen To Help Arlen Save His Own Ass?

Yesterday, Roll Call rolled out an "ooh, scary" story from the Gee-Ooooh-Pee threatening to stage a big ole humdinger of a filibuster on Dawn Johnsen’s nomination to head up OLC.

Even managed to get Jon Kyl to crawl out from under his rock and declare in his most ponderous and full-o-shite tone:

“My view is that the nomination should not go forward, and I think most Republicans feel the same way,” Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.), who is a member of the Judiciary Committee, said Tuesday.

The GOP’s Minority Whip "thinks" most of the GOP "feel" the same way?  Pathetically tepid. 

But there was this deftly planted bit near the end.  A story within the storytelling, if you will.

Pauvre Arlen Specter.  He’s either made a frenemy somewhere within his own caucus. Or Specter’s political weaknesses are so apparent that Roll Call journalists now announce them at will where Specter’s name pops up. 

I’m not certain which is worse. 

Via Roll Call (subscr. req.):

Should Republicans ultimately decide to filibuster Johnsen’s nomination, it could be a boon to Specter’s re-election efforts. Specter is looking at a tough primary challenge from former Rep. Pat Toomey…

Specter also faces a dwindling base across the state as hundreds of thousands of moderate Republicans have changed their registrations to Democratic since 2004…. Specter is at a disadvantage in the closed GOP primary without those moderate Republicans and will likely have to mount a voter registration drive to switch some of those Democrats back before 2010.

But a filibuster of Johnsen could help Specter significantly bolster his conservative credentials with the voters back home. One Republican said a filibuster “could be very good for him,” particularly because opposition to Johnsen’s nomination runs the spectrum of conservative constituencies….

Owie. That scorched.

So, these are the only options? The GOP stages a bread and circuses showboat to rile up the frothing-at-the-mouth base in order to give Arlen a desperately needed moment in the gussied-up fake spotlight he’s demanding for himself?  Or they pretend to, can’t muster support and then get drinks at the club instead?

Doesn’t this sound like a hammy version of Auntie Mame’s "stepped on the ping pong ball" scene?  Frankly, Arlen couldn’t carry off the diamond-encrusted cigarette holder and cocktail ring, or the uptown party frock.  But I digress.

Has the GOP been reduced to scrambling to cover each others dwindling asses?

Because the OLC needs real leadership.  And they needed it yesterday.  Not some craptastic showboat idiocy dressed up in buttons and bows.

Dawn Johnsen’s credentials are superb.  She’d be fantastic in the job. Which is what scares the bejeebers out of folks like Jon Kyl and John Cornyn who don’t want anyone questioning faulty legal rationale or poking around festering turdpiles in the OLC corners. 

And that’s the real story here, isn’t it? Why not take the wind out of their sagging sails up front and release the rest of the OLC memos publicly?

(YouTube — Auntie Mame’s "stepped on the ping pong ball ghastly story scene)

 
128 Responses to "Will GOP Stage Paltry Showboat On Dawn Johnsen To Help Arlen Save His Own Ass?"
Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 06:05 am 1

Morning gang — hope folks enjoy the picture. *g*


demi | Thursday April 2, 2009 06:12 am 2

It is a little easier on the eyes than the picture at your link to TBogg in the previous post.
Ouch-a-roonie.


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 06:13 am 3
In response to demi @ 2

That pix was particularly illustrative of tbogg’s point, wasn’t it? *g* Aiiiyeeee…


demi | Thursday April 2, 2009 06:19 am 4
In response to Christy Hardin Smith @ 3

I sort of fell off my diet whilst I had the flu. But, that visual has me rather determined to get back on that pony. Good thing I’m feeling better. You?


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 06:21 am 5
In response to demi @ 4

Still snot central here. But my antibiotics are beginning to kick in, so I’m hopeful I’ll turn the corner by the weekend. Glad you are feeling better!


demi | Thursday April 2, 2009 06:27 am 6

Thanks. Have you got a pot of boiling water on the stove? Try it. You just saunter over to it every so often and breathe the steam deeply.
Now, is there anything we can do to help Ms. Johnson? (I can’t help thinking of Miami Vice every time I see her name, tho.)


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 06:29 am 7
In response to demi @ 6

Am asking around on how to best help push her nomination forward. Have several queries out today — will let folks know if there is something we can all do. In the meantime, calling your Senators is a good place to start — voice support for Dawn and ask for a vote FOR her nomination.


Waccamaw | Thursday April 2, 2009 06:33 am 8

I’ve come to feel about spector [sic] the way the punster (iirc) feels about liarman….tho’ liarman will forever remain on the “not fit to be a human being” list as well. A pox on both their houses!


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 06:37 am 9
In response to Waccamaw @ 8

He’s such a weathervane in terms of pointing toward wherever Beltway egos happen to be, isn’t he? It’s all cover for him to be able to say “I fought hard for this” when what he was really doing was fighting hard to give himself cover to argue out of both sides of his mouth depending on which constituency he needs to reach in the next election cycle.

And so it goes…


Phoenix Woman | Thursday April 2, 2009 06:44 am 10

Woof!


Waccamaw | Thursday April 2, 2009 06:45 am 11
In response to Christy Hardin Smith @ 9

Y’know, in some ways spector irritates me more than people like issa and bachmann; they are quite obviously barking mad. spector’s “Mr. Reasonable Guy” routine is smooth enough to fool a lot of people which makes him doubly dangerous.


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 06:46 am 12
In response to Phoenix Woman @ 10

I thought the doggie pix was too adorable not to use. *g*


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 06:48 am 13
In response to Waccamaw @ 11

He certainly has the act down to an art form. I remember when he pulled that fast one on Leahy on the Senate floor during the FISA debate. And then acted all hurt when Leahy called him on his duplicity.


Kassandra | Thursday April 2, 2009 06:48 am 14

“Across the conservative constituency”…….Would that include the Blue Dawgs as well?
We need reconciliation……..NOW! AND we need Dawn Johnson. Since Obama can’t/won’t do any heavy lifting, he needs a pugnacious protagonist in that job…..if only for the appearance of investigations.


barbara | Thursday April 2, 2009 06:51 am 15
In response to Christy Hardin Smith @ 5

“snot central” LOL Et tu, Christy?


barbara | Thursday April 2, 2009 06:54 am 16
In response to demi @ 6

OMG. White suit, anyone?


demi | Thursday April 2, 2009 06:54 am 17
In response to Waccamaw @ 11

It sure doesn’t take much to fool a lot of people, does it? I think we should consider making it law to have all of the politicians wear funny striped pants and big red shoes, (like in the picture), and also big red noses and tiny hats. That’s what I think this am. I’m getting a headache from watching c-span’s coverage of the house discussing alternative budgets. barf. Why am I doing this? Trying to learn something.


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 06:54 am 18
In response to Kassandra @ 14

Cornyn has been particularly shrill about Dawn Johnson. And he has a lot invested in the “torture laws are awesome and oh so legally sound” argument from the last few years. The Bush Administration fronted him out in National Review and elsewhere as their apologist for Yoo, Bradbury and beyond — and Cornyn willingly played the stooge role on that for them.

If that falls, especially if it falls through legal ridicule — he’ll have to take a hit with it. And he knows it.

There is so much tied up in all of this that is personal, but not fo the reasons that so many of these people are using for their public kabuki presentations.


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 06:58 am 19

The digg is open, btw, gang. Thanks!


ally | Thursday April 2, 2009 06:59 am 20

Specter cannot get re-elected in PA. If he continues down the Rethug road and obstructs Ms. Johnson and EFCA – it is a sure sign that he is going to retire and is looking for Repub welfare down the road for himself and his staff.

Can’t wait until 2010 and PA has 2 senators that are not embarrassing.


Kassandra | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:00 am 21

I hear the progressives may actually be thinking about maybe someday forming a caucus…………..


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:00 am 22
In response to ally @ 20

Here’s hoping. This certainly smacks of serious desperation on Arlen’s part, that’s for sure.


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:02 am 23
In response to Kassandra @ 21

We’ll see if it actually happens. Would be a good move — but I’m not holding my breath just yet. *g*


Waccamaw | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:04 am 24
In response to demi @ 17

One of the blogs (can’t remember which) has done some wonderful photo-shopping of pols in clown-face.

I’d settle for required lapel pins to ID the known liars…….tho’ whoever’s wearing the biggest flag is usually a pretty good tip-off. Bigger the flag = bigger the liar.


cbl2 | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:05 am 25
In response to Kassandra @ 21

maybe they’ll even form the largest caucus bloc in Congress – .and, and, then the newly elected Democrat President will meet with them – Oh Wait !

ghastly !


Pade | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:05 am 26

Thanks for the Auntie Mame bit – I always enjoy that movie. As a youngster the book by Patrick Denis was one of the first “grown up” books I read.

I live in Pa and attended one of Arlen’s town halls. He was very busy claiming that he and Snow and Collins were the only moderate Republicans left. I don’t think he has a prayer no matter what he does.


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:05 am 27
In response to Waccamaw @ 24

Now THAT would be an interesting study. “For what is that large flag lapel pin compensating, Senator?”


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:07 am 28
In response to Pade @ 26

It’s interesting to watch SPecter try to walk both sides of the political fence at the exact same time. And rather bizarre.

And I adore Auntie Mame. Glad you enjoyed the clip.


oldgold | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:07 am 29

In 2010 Spector will be 80 years old. Forgetting his ideology or lack thereof for a moment, am I the only one who thinks 80 is too damn old to start a six year term in the Senate?
I think an age limit for Congress and the federal judiciary would be a good idea. It might cure some of what ails these institutions.


eCAHNomics | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:08 am 30

I counting down the days until Obama withdraws Johnson’s nomination in the interest of bipartisanship.


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:08 am 31
In response to oldgold @ 29

But…but…but…Strom Thurmond…

(which I believe just reinforces your point)


barbara | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:08 am 32

Kinda, sorta related re Dawn Johnsen infiltrating the boys’ club, just took a gander at the G-20 “class photo” on HuffPost. Three women. Three. One of whom is the tiny little queen of England, who was not elected to her post.


barbara | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:09 am 33
In response to oldgold @ 29

How old is Scalia? One year younger than that should be the limit there.


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:09 am 34
In response to eCAHNomics @ 30

Doubt that is going to happen. Leahy was openly mocking the GOP in the Roll Call article. It was amusing as hell.

That Kyl quote from above is so tepid and pitiful, I’m amazed he was even able to say it out loud and then be seen in public.


demi | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:10 am 35

Watching Dan Lungren and David Dreir arguing with each other on the house floor is too funny. Now, Earl of the bow tie from oregon is a little easier to swallow.
I might have had my fill of this for now. There’s work in the garden that’s calling. BTW, lots of little baby grapes on the vine…right now they are a symbol of hope for me.


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:12 am 36
In response to demi @ 35

Ugh. Dan Lungren.


cbl2 | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:13 am 37
In response to Waccamaw @ 24

One of the blogs (can’t remember which) has done some wonderful photo-shopping of pols in clown-face.

here’s a flickr set – beautifully done


Waccamaw | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:13 am 38

* waves hand wildly*

Me! Call on me! I know the answer to that one!


WarOnWarOff | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:13 am 39
In response to oldgold @ 29

Oh then, we’ll have to do *exactly* what he asks and be vewy, vewy nice to him, a la 85-year old Ted Stevens. Po, po old Ted. Never did nothin’ to nobody. Po, po old Awwen.


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:14 am 40
In response to Waccamaw @ 38

ROFLMAO


cbl2 | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:14 am 41
In response to cbl2 @ 37

Rayne | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:15 am 42

You know, I have a feeling that Cornyn is actually scared about his own buttocks. He had exposure to Abramoff which was never investigated (to the best of our knowledge).

And I’ll bet that’s just the tip of the iceberg.


cbl2 | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:16 am 43
In response to oldgold @ 29

did you hear the outraged Tweety yesterday, going on and on, full spittlpalooza about the loss of the 85 year old Ted Stevens’ “career” ?


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:17 am 44
In response to Rayne @ 42

I’d make that same bet. And I do wonder what our old pal Ralphie Boy Reed is doing with all of his spare time during his exiled pariah status period. Don’t you?


eCAHNomics | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:17 am 45

1. Obama isn’t Leahy.

2. Leahy is a wimp. Just cancelled his truth commission.


cbl2 | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:19 am 46
In response to Rayne @ 42

Amen ! and he was the State AG at the time ferchrissakes -


CTuttle | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:19 am 47
In response to Christy Hardin Smith @ 5

Aloha, Redd! I hope ya get well soon! *g*


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:20 am 48
In response to eCAHNomics @ 45

Conjecture is rife on a lot of sides of things these days, but I’ve heard nothing — not one thing — about any support for Dawn Johnson wavering from any corner of any Dem group or leadership person, on or off the Hill.

Take it FWIW.


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:21 am 49
In response to CTuttle @ 47

Me, too — I hate being stuffed up more than just about anything. Ugh.


eCAHNomics | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:21 am 50

Just trying to put the cynicism I learned so painfully in the last 8 years to good purpose.


Pade | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:21 am 51

I’m hoping Holder takes up the politically motivated case of Don Siegalman and if I remember correctly there were a few other dems with questionable cases. It would have been smart to start with Stevens to disarm any complaints. Don was on with Tom Hartmann yesterday talking about his case. It goes back to the same questionable trial judge soon.


cbl2 | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:22 am 52

Christy, was commenting last night that the forced birthers are getting restless with so many of the big daddies gone to ground – was wondering if our favorite opportunist was gonna step in to the leadership vacuum


greenwarrior | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:22 am 53

cbl2

ygm….


Rayne | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:23 am 54

Ugh. I try not to think about wee little Ralphie, but the squeeze play those two good old boys (Reed and Cornyn) put on tribes still deserves to be aired out more fully.

I think we may see more of Reed as the UIGEA becomes more fully scrutinized, though. This may be a popcorn opportunity in the offing.


CTuttle | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:23 am 55
In response to eCAHNomics @ 45

Aloha, eCAHN! I just read that over at DU, sounds credible… Sad situation… His aide saying; “He’s(Leahy) all you’ve got…!”


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:23 am 56
In response to cbl2 @ 52

I’ve been wondering that same thing. If nothing else, Ralph has a good nose for his own opportunistic spotlight moments if there is profit in it for he and his, dontcha think? Praise the lord and pass the collection plate…


Blub | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:24 am 57

As we contemplate this idiocy, its still important to bear in mind that, as far as voting records go, the worst Dem (or even Connecticut for Lieberman party member) (worst being Ben Nelson in the Senate) is still lightyears ahead of the best Rethugs (Dear Arlen, Snowe, Collins).

Senate
http://www.progressivepunch.or…..&y=10

Ditto in the House – worst Dem = Joe Donnely (IN-2) , still much better than the best Rethugs = Ron Paul (TX-14) and Rodney Alexander (LA-5).

As much as we treat blue dawgs/new dems with contempt, they’re still infinitely preferably to even the best rethugs, by the numbers… which puts the lie to the whole crossing the aisle nonsense.
House
http://www.progressivepunch.or…..;party=All


Waccamaw | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:24 am 58
In response to cbl2 @ 41

Donkey’s ears to load on dial-up but well worth the time; ta for the linky. :-)


cbl2 | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:26 am 59

I’d settle for required lapel pins to ID the known liars

long ago, in a thread far away it was agreed they should be like race car drivers and be forced to wear suits festiooned with their patron’s logos


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:27 am 60
In response to cbl2 @ 59

Could we mandate that TARP-fund-receiving bank logos be plastered across their backsides — just for the C-Span cameras? Because that could be some serious fun.


cbl2 | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:27 am 61

“festooned” dammit !


oldgold | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:28 am 62

Yes, Leahy is like an old Vermont sugar maple, all bark and no syrup.


eCAHNomics | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:29 am 63
In response to oldgold @ 62

Nice one.


demi | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:29 am 64
In response to cbl2 @ 59

I remember that! I think it was a late or late, late night thread.


eCAHNomics | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:30 am 65

OT

Kabuki hearing on AIG on cspan3 is allowing Greenberg a stage to praise himself.


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:31 am 66
In response to Pade @ 51

I’d like to see the USAtty there replaced sooner rather than later, too. Clean slate there please — soon as possible.


foothillsmike | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:31 am 67
In response to Pade @ 51

One of the most outragious Rove provoked persecutions is the case of Paul Minor.
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/….._0401.html


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:31 am 68
In response to eCAHNomics @ 65

Rather bizarre, isn’t it?


cbl2 | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:32 am 69

Mister Chairman, I yield the balance of my time to the gentleman from Wells Fargo


demi | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:32 am 70

Is anyone else watching c-span? What do you think of that smack down Madam Chairman gave to Bully Dreier? I try not to do the cynical name calling thing, but he is seriously asking for it.


CTuttle | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:33 am 71
In response to oldgold @ 62

Speaking of which, that syrup is giving gold a run for it’s money… I’m sure the Vt/NH sappers are enjoying the boom…!


eCAHNomics | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:33 am 72

I just tuned in. And yes, I couldn’t believe my ears.


selise | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:33 am 73
In response to eCAHNomics @ 45

Leahy is a wimp. Just cancelled his truth commission.

if leahy was playing wedge politics (to divide people who were willing to T&R vs those who wanted prosecutions), all i can say is: mission accomplished.

oh, and leahy can bite me. is there any reason to think he is not just as duplicitous as specter?


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:33 am 74
In response to cbl2 @ 69

bwahahahahahaha — now that would be a hoot and a half.


Waccamaw | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:34 am 75
In response to Pade @ 51

The thing of which I am *very* afraid is that the repukes, boss limpballs, tweety and others of their ilk are gonna go into full baying hound mode for the heads of the people at DOJ (interestingly, several of them are females, iirc) and holder will drop everything else and go after them. I’d be willing to bet quite a few bucks that that’s the way the cookie is likely to crumble.


eCAHNomics | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:36 am 76

What’s the story with the USAttys? Are the W ones still in place?


Rayne | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:37 am 77
In response to Blub @ 57

But Blue Dogs must feel constant pressure not to drift to the right, or they won’t stay Blue.

They’ll simply become dogs on the opposition’s porch.

There’s another problem with Blue Dogs which we don’t discuss, and that’s their unpredictability. We need them to be reliably blue on key issues and they’re not; they are as frustrating as Arlen “Scottish Haggis” Specter is to the Republican Party. We might give them more support — more than Kyl gives Specter above — were they a little less prone to grandstanding at the wrong damned time.


Blub | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:37 am 78
In response to selise @ 73

I know you’re talking about leadership and not voting record, but in terms of voting records Leahy votes on the progressive side of issues 89% of the time, versus 37% for Specter. Again, no comparison. Rethugs are another species. The best of them cannot be compared to the worst of us.


selise | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:37 am 79

cbl2 | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:38 am 80

Kabuki hearing on AIG on cspan3

demi – Issa was stamping his little cloven hooves about the committee allowing Greenberg to testify repleat with sternly worded letter


Blub | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:39 am 81
In response to Rayne @ 77

oh I agree, and I’m not defending blue dawgs. We need to call them out every time we get, put the pressure on ‘em, vote ‘em out of office (well, the real ones, for some weird reason there’s a few progressives who maintain their membership, especially in the House), and all that…

I’m just pointing out how far the rethug party has fallen, and why they’re basically irredeemable.


eCAHNomics | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:39 am 82
In response to Blub @ 78

Well, even voting record means less and less every year that the whole structure drifts to the right. And leadership (lack thereof) has a lot to do with the drift.


eCAHNomics | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:40 am 83
In response to selise @ 79

Second that. Loved that diary.


foothillsmike | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:40 am 84
In response to eCAHNomics @ 76

That is what burrowing will get ya.


eCAHNomics | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:41 am 85

OMG, Greenberg accepts no repsonsibility for the downgrade that occurred the day after he left.


eCAHNomics | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:42 am 86
In response to foothillsmike @ 84

But Obama knows they’re there. Does he intend to replace them? After all the scadal, you’d think that would be toward the top of the priority list.


demi | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:44 am 87
In response to cbl2 @ 80

Okay, I’m switching over from C-1 to C-3.
Gives me the shivers, and not the good tingly ones.


selise | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:44 am 88
In response to Blub @ 78

Rethugs are another species. The best of them cannot be compared to the worst of us.

just not true. for example, lincoln chafee voted against the iraq war and one of my senators, in a very safe seat, kerry voted for the war. you know about confirmation bias?

more importantly, one thing i’ve learned from watching the fisa kabuki carefully was just how gamed the votes were.


Blub | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:45 am 89
In response to eCAHNomics @ 76

http://www.washingtonpost.com/…..ml?ref=fp1

Some are refusing to go quietly…


Blub | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:46 am 90
In response to selise @ 88

I go by the numbers.


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:46 am 91
In response to eCAHNomics @ 86

Most of them are to be replaced, but some are to be kept, is my understanding. Folks like Pat Fitzgerald and a few others who have ongoing caseloads that need continuity or who have been doing a good job. Others need to be replaced, but they are going to be done on a case by case basis instead of wholesale to avoid an appearance of equal politicization in the opposite direction from what I’ve heard. But that’s only what I’m hearing from the outside — I haven’t heard anything from any internal DOJ sources on that as yet.


selise | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:47 am 92
In response to eCAHNomics @ 83

thanks.

i’m gobsmacked that anyone thinks the problem with these hearings is bachman (as batshit crazy as she appears to be) and not barney frank who is responsible for how the hearings are organized and run..


foothillsmike | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:47 am 93
In response to eCAHNomics @ 86

Generally one would expect the new leadership to be in place and then work down the food chain. See Dawn Johnson. Many of these people are in protected positions. To let them go involves a lot of documentation including things like annual performance reviews and improvement plans etc. It doesn’t happen overnight.


Pade | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:48 am 94
In response to eCAHNomics @ 86

Don Siegelman said yesterday that the same people were still in place in Alabama and other places as well. DOJ has not required them to resign. The one from the Pittsburg area refused to resign. The friends of Rove are still in control.


selise | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:51 am 95
In response to Blub @ 90

you may want to read taleb’s the black swan. just started it, but so far is the best, by far, popular description of some of the most common cognitive biases. something i’ve had reason to be thinking about a lot over the years. strongly recommended.


cbl2 | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:52 am 96

USAA’s

one of them, has recently added to his caseload

Brett Tolman – Hatch/Specter buttboy who added language in to bill circumventing certain Senate Confirmations indicted Utah Monkeywrencher this week:

link


BargainCountertenor | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:53 am 97

Selise,

I have the single-payer bills downloaded (the @#*ing GPO doesn’t have S 1200 in pdf yet, so I have it in HTML. Yuck.) It’s going to take a couple of days to digest the things.


demi | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:53 am 98
In response to Blub @ 89

Have you, or anyone else, read or heard about the possibility of reinstating some of the prosecutors who were let go by Gonzalez? Carol (I forgot her last name) who was fired for (supposedly )not prosecuting voter fraud?


foothillsmike | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:57 am 99
In response to demi @ 98

I believe Ignatius (sp) from NM has been hired.


Waccamaw | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:58 am 100
In response to selise @ 92

“appears” to be???????????? If bachmann only “appears” barking mad, Dog save us from those who actually *are*!


cbl2 | Thursday April 2, 2009 07:59 am 101
In response to demi @ 98

Carol Lam

took private sector job with the righteous cash, (as did her “successor”) so it’s doubtful she’d return .

foothillsmike @ 99 – got link on Yglesias ?


selise | Thursday April 2, 2009 08:00 am 102
In response to BargainCountertenor @ 97

bless you, bless you!!!

you might try calling the office of bill’s author – i’ve had luck with rep’s office emailing me bills before they were even on thomas. if there is anything of that nature (scut work tracking down docs for example) that i can do to help, please let me know (i can be reached via email at gmail).

thanks again – your analysis will be very helpful.


selise | Thursday April 2, 2009 08:02 am 103
In response to Waccamaw @ 100

LOL! i was giving her the benefit of the doubt as imo she’s either batshit crazy or maliciously pretending to be.


demi | Thursday April 2, 2009 08:02 am 104
In response to foothillsmike @ 99

Here’s the info on David (A Few Good Men) Iglesias’ new job…to be part of a special team of prosecutors for Guantanamo detainees.
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/…..s-new-job/


cbl2 | Thursday April 2, 2009 08:03 am 105

demi and others – AIG ‘hearing’

Issa link

he actually poo-poos the idea of someone using public forums to “rehabilitate one’s image” – go get ‘im Joyride !


Blub | Thursday April 2, 2009 08:04 am 106
In response to cbl2 @ 101

I still think the Dems should consider running Lam against Bilbray in CA-50. The incumbent representative is a bad joke. Anti-corruption should play well there, given that its the Dukester’s old district.


Waccamaw | Thursday April 2, 2009 08:05 am 107
In response to selise @ 103

No question whatsoever in my mind…..definitely #1….witness her leadership in the US currency brouhaha.


cbl2 | Thursday April 2, 2009 08:07 am 108
In response to Blub @ 106

wonder if Congressman Lewis would endorse her – :D


foothillsmike | Thursday April 2, 2009 08:07 am 109
In response to cbl2 @ 101

He was reactivated by JAG to deal with Gitmo
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Iglesias_(attorney)


cbl2 | Thursday April 2, 2009 08:08 am 110
In response to foothillsmike @ 109

thanks to you and demi above !


Waccamaw | Thursday April 2, 2009 08:08 am 111

cbl2 @ 105 -

Another example of IOKIYAR.


demi | Thursday April 2, 2009 08:08 am 112
In response to cbl2 @ 105

I’m shocked that anyone would do that. Aren’t you?
Did you see my Iglesias link?


Blub | Thursday April 2, 2009 08:08 am 113
In response to cbl2 @ 101

oh.. more on Lam. When she was fired, she was supposedly investigating rethug Rep. Jerry Lewis for corruption, prompting Dem allegations that the dismissal was a shrubco/rethug attempt to suppress that investigation (Lewis was allegedly in the pocket of shrubco-friendly defense contractors). I think she’s been mentioned as a possible US Supreme Court nominee.


Blub | Thursday April 2, 2009 08:09 am 114
In response to cbl2 @ 108

oh sorry.. we overlapped on the Lewis comment ;P


selise | Thursday April 2, 2009 08:12 am 115
In response to Waccamaw @ 107

i did see her during the last aig hearing ask about it. just thought she didn’t understand the difference between global reserve currency and national currency – which i bet is true of most americans since the dollar is now both.


demi | Thursday April 2, 2009 08:23 am 116

Thanks for this thread all. T’was a good one.


cbl2 | Thursday April 2, 2009 08:25 am 117

Ann in AZ | Thursday April 2, 2009 08:26 am 118

New Jane post up: “GOP Messaging: Mission Fail”


Waccamaw | Thursday April 2, 2009 08:35 am 119
In response to selise @ 115

which i bet is true of most americans since the dollar is now both.

Count on it….given the fact that I’ve yet to hear any of the TV airheads explain it at all.


selise | Thursday April 2, 2009 08:51 am 120
In response to Waccamaw @ 119

doesn’t surprise me. i actually read about it first in the UN commission recommendations (chaired by stiglitz). and am still trying to figure it out. posted some links in an oxdown diary in case it’s something that interests you. and if you know more than me, please share.

http://oxdown.firedoglake.com/diary/4389


james | Thursday April 2, 2009 09:24 am 121

If this hasn’t been mentioned by anyone anywhere I’m wondering if Obama will resort to a recess appointment that favored tactic of our previous tin dictator when the congress wouldn’t play along with his more odious appointments (John Bolton anyone?). With Democratic majorities in both houses there’s no chance that the congress can be kept in session during the normal recesses and it would do nicely to rub the noses of the GOP in their own stink from the last eight years.


tejanarusa | Thursday April 2, 2009 12:51 pm 122
In response to Christy Hardin Smith @ 7

Hope you find something we can do other than calling our reps — as I’ve wailed to y’all more than once – my senator is — John Cornyn.

It is to weep.


tejanarusa | Thursday April 2, 2009 12:59 pm 123
In response to Rayne @ 42

Im hoping for something from the “Sir” Aland Stanford investigations, which seems a bit aquiet at the moment.

And btw, I’m getting irked at the “media” people who keep calling him “Sir” Alan, without quotes. Doesn’t anybody know anymore than Americans cannot accept knighthoods? It’s in that little piece of paper we seem to ignore more and more, called the Constitution.

We don’t curtsy to the Queen of England, either. At least we used to not. Afraid to know what the current custom is.


MrWhy | Thursday April 2, 2009 02:23 pm 124
In response to barbara @ 33

Born March 1936, so he just turned 73. Kennedy is 4 months younger, Ginsberg is 3 years older. Term limit is not a bad idea. I would suggest 70 is a reasonable age.


texasaggie | Thursday April 2, 2009 03:37 pm 125

Christy,

Enjoyed your comment on the ping-pong ball scene in Auntie Mame. It suggests that you may be part of my generation. I knew that there was a reason that I liked you.

And tejana, I’ve also been in constant contact with Mr. Cornyn to absolutely no avail. I’ve even been polite and had my wife vet my utterances before I sent them. By the way, my wife is amazing at her ability to convince people to do what they ought to do even when they don’t want to. I wish I had her ability to soft talk people into doing what is right rather than trying to argue with them the way I do, which, as implied above, doesn’t work at all.


Leen | Friday April 3, 2009 01:04 pm 126

“the OLC needs real leadership” and it is looking like the Republicans need more lies under oath having to do with blow jobs to investigate to get their justice juices going.

When are they going to take Justice and accountbility seriously. Oh yeah “the truth” will not set some of them free


bobschacht | Friday April 3, 2009 04:24 pm 127
In response to oldgold @ 29

You want to brush aside Sen. Harry Byrd (92)?

Here in Hawaii, we specialize in Old Male Senators. Sen. Akaka was just re-elected in 2006 when he was 82. Our other Senator, Daniel Inouye, is the same age as Akaka and swears that he will run for re-election in 2010, when he will be 86.

Ted Kennedy is 77, I think. If he lives to be 80, it will be a miracle.

Bob in HI


bobschacht | Friday April 3, 2009 04:28 pm 128
In response to eCAHNomics @ 45

Well, I’m pissed at Leahey too, but look: He wants it to be bipartisan. He can’t get any Republicans on his committee to support it. How’s he going to staff a bipartisan commission if Republicans won’t join?

Better to get Holder to appoint a Special Prosecutor.

Bob in HI


Sorry but the comments are closed on this post

Close