Nope…*

No substance over here, either.

Nope…no GOP budget numbers over here.

But there is a hefty helping of GOP finger-pointing, ducking of responsibility and disarray:

…now we learn that Reps. Eric Cantor and Paul Ryan objected to unveiling yesterday’s ‘blueprint,’ but were overruled by Reps. John Boehner and Mike Pence. But bigger than any internal disagreements or any criticism about a lack of details is the fact that yesterday’s GOP non-announcement moved the attention away from the Obama-vs.-congressional Democrat storyline to the GOP’s lack of a budget.

What’s more, now Rep. Ryan’s little group of GOP Budgeteers now has to produce something so stunningly awesome that the Boehner press conference becomes a mere whiff of a memory of a disaster.

And rumor has it that the Senate Republicans are either "laughing at their House GOP colleagues, furious at them, or both."

The folks at The Swamp have more. As Hilzoy says:

Maybe next week they’ll present their budget using interpretive dance or little animated jelly beans."

Oh please, please let that happen. 

From the DNC:

*This ongoing laughfest saga brought to you by the fail that keeps on giving.

 
37 Responses to "Nope…*"
GregOPauls | Friday March 27, 2009 11:11 am 1

The GOP plan methodically takes the Democratic bill apart. On health care, it complains that “Democrats propose to finance nationalized health care,” and says a better solution would be allowing people to shop across state lines for insurance policies.

On spending, the Republican plan lists specific objections to Democrats’ plans, but proposes only that the GOP would “cut overall nondefense spending by reforming or eliminating a host of wasteful programs deemed ineffective by various government entities.”

Taxes would be lower, the Republicans promise, in a “simple and fair tax code” with a 10 percent tax rate for incomes up to $100,000 and 25 percent thereafter, as well as “a generous standard deduction and personal exemption.”

However, Republicans also would “allow any individual or family satisfied with their current tax structure” to pay those rates, though it would drop the two lowest brackets by 5 percent. Rates currently range from 10 percent to 35 percent.

On energy, the Republican plan would open the Arctic Coastal Plain to energy exploration, while making it easier to build new nuclear reactors.

And the party says it would help ease financial industry turmoil by discouraging bailouts and creating a climate of “certainty and economic growth.”


Christy Hardin Smith | Friday March 27, 2009 11:34 am 2
In response to GregOPauls @ 1

No, it really doesn’t. Which is why the GOP leadership in the Senate are pissed as hell.


Christy Hardin Smith | Friday March 27, 2009 11:43 am 3
In response to Christy Hardin Smith @ 2

Further both the National Review and the American Spectator have voiced substantial dismay at the paucity of anything remotely useful and the craptastic way in which this was rolled out.

Wake up and smell the failure.


EvilDrPuma | Friday March 27, 2009 12:54 pm 4
In response to GregOPauls @ 1

I’ll give good money you didn’t even read the damned thing.


demi | Friday March 27, 2009 02:13 pm 5
In response to GregOPauls @ 1

Greg, I’m going to tell you this straight out — you’re starting to get on my nerves.
For the most part, I don’t mind someone coming on a Christy thread with a deviant opinion, if it’s an intellectually sound one.
You throw ideas around which are not sound, and when people stoop to point you in a different direction, you disappear. Until the end of the thread. Then, to make matters worse, you repost that same comment at the beginning of a new thread.
It’s poor form, Greg, and not appreciated.


Raven | Friday March 27, 2009 04:36 pm 6

Mornin Joe was hammering Boner when he would say whether or not he would vote for another stimulus!


Raven | Friday March 27, 2009 04:36 pm 7
In response to demi @ 5

This punk need a shove?


demi | Friday March 27, 2009 04:38 pm 8
In response to Raven @ 7

You volunteering?


Raven | Friday March 27, 2009 04:38 pm 9
In response to demi @ 8

Hell yes.


ShotoJamf | Friday March 27, 2009 04:44 pm 10
In response to Christy Hardin Smith @ 3

“Craptastic”? I love that term! I’m going to go ahead and steal it, giving you full credit, of course.


readerOfTeaLeaves | Friday March 27, 2009 04:45 pm 11
In response to Raven @ 6

Well it doesn’t get too much better — here’s hoping for the jelly beans!


ShotoJamf | Friday March 27, 2009 04:45 pm 12
In response to demi @ 8

I’ll sign up for that gig.


demi | Friday March 27, 2009 04:48 pm 13
In response to Raven @ 9

This morning, Christy led an interesting discussion of the ridiculous presser yesterday held by Bohner. Here is the comment that this “punk” made that kind of ticked me off…
I can understand the fear that everyone has. The GOP will come out and disclose the details of the budget and the country’s smart people will follow. A budget of spending is not a budget, it should be called a spending.
I gave him the dictionary definition of “budget” and he disappeared until the end of the thread with the same comment as the one above.


ShotoJamf | Friday March 27, 2009 04:48 pm 14

Why is Boner Boehner getting criticized for his budget pamphlet? The size of the document allows them to post it on car windshields in mall parking lots, really get the word out. It’s genius! Not even Sarah Palin is this visionary.


demi | Friday March 27, 2009 04:51 pm 15
In response to ShotoJamf @ 12

It’s out of my purview to understand some folks. Be my guests.


Hugh | Friday March 27, 2009 04:57 pm 16

Whether the Republicans had numbers or not, they and their economic plans remain insane.

This reminds me of something I once read about psychosis. You can tell someone is faking it because they will come into the room swinging on the chandeliers. The truly psychotic otoh will come into the room swinging on the chandeliers –that aren’t there. I think the Democrats are fake nuts and the Republicans are real nuts.


Hugh | Friday March 27, 2009 05:00 pm 17

BTW if it has not been linked to before (as if) Matt Taibbi gave an enjoyable response to the AIG exec who resigned over his bonus.

http://www.alternet.org/column…..%2C_right/

We raised most of Matt’s points here at the time but it is another fun read.


MadDog | Friday March 27, 2009 05:02 pm 18

Christy, note that Cantor is likely happy that Boehner and crew jumped the shark ’cause it helps Cantor in his pursuit of Boehner’s leadership position as top House Republican dog.

I suspect that Cantor played both ends against the middle on this one.

Poor Boehner! Clueless and lovin’ it!


BooRadley | Friday March 27, 2009 05:02 pm 19

Thanks Christy.

digg is open


allan | Friday March 27, 2009 05:04 pm 20

I wish the Republicans would just make up their God d*mn minds
whether they want to be the American Taliban, John Galt or the Keystone Kops.


ShotoJamf | Friday March 27, 2009 05:06 pm 21
In response to MadDog @ 18

Put in that light, Cantor appears even sleazier and more underhanded than I had previously given him credit for. I can definitely see him pulling a shank on Boner Boehner. Very creepy guy.


Hugh | Friday March 27, 2009 05:10 pm 22

Washington Week just announced that this is the week that Geithner got his cred back.

Just another example of why the Beltway reporters on it are such vacuous idiots.


KayInMaine | Friday March 27, 2009 05:11 pm 23

I have a feeling that the reason why the market went up yesterday after the republican’s presser is because the stock market was HAPPY that the republicans DIDN’T HAVE A PLAN. It was almost as if the investors were saying, “Phew. That was close. We dodged a bullet”.


Hugh | Friday March 27, 2009 05:13 pm 24

More from Washington Week: The financial meltdown happened because of gaps between regulatory agencies.

Glad to know it had nothing to do with all the deregulation and non-regulation we saw.


Elliott | Friday March 27, 2009 05:13 pm 25
In response to Hugh @ 22

Cummings should put a sock in it.


demi | Friday March 27, 2009 05:14 pm 26

Here’s the link (http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/03/27/is-the-gop-tilting-at-wingnuts/#comments) to Christy’s earlier thread on the subject.


lynnb | Friday March 27, 2009 05:15 pm 27

I can’t decide if Boehner just isn’t very bright or he has wet brain. I wish he and his colleagues would have a presser every day, so the whole country can see them in action.


demi | Friday March 27, 2009 05:15 pm 28

Sorry about the long link. :(


KayInMaine | Friday March 27, 2009 05:16 pm 29
In response to lynnb @ 27

Most days he’s shitfaced.


KayInMaine | Friday March 27, 2009 05:16 pm 30
In response to ShotoJamf @ 21

I agree. He’s a thinner version of Tom Delay.


Blub | Friday March 27, 2009 05:23 pm 31

I think party chairman LimpBark needs to step in here and show some leadership. Surely he must have a budget somewhere under his 400 pounds of lipid goo.


foothillsmike | Friday March 27, 2009 05:25 pm 32

They need to go out en mass so they can prop each other up


Eureka Springs | Friday March 27, 2009 05:29 pm 33

Elephant upstairs!


Teddy Partridge | Friday March 27, 2009 06:07 pm 34
In response to KayInMaine @ 29

Yeah, he looked pretty lit to me, at the presser.


druidity36 | Friday March 27, 2009 06:22 pm 35
In response to ShotoJamf @ 10

second only to “crapulence”… courtesy of The Simpsons, of course.

Oh, and you can sign me up for booting Mr “GOP” too… man is that guy a jerk!


Minnesotachuck | Friday March 27, 2009 07:59 pm 36
In response to allan @ 20

I wish the Republicans would just make up their God d*mn minds
whether they want to be the American Taliban, John Galt or the Keystone Kops.

Allan, you’ve really got to be more conscientious about including spew alerts.


Minnesotachuck | Friday March 27, 2009 08:05 pm 37
In response to demi @ 28

Next time use http://tinyurl.com/


Sorry but the comments are closed on this post

Close