UBS Pays $780M For Aiding Tax Cheats: Where’s Phil Gramm?

Somewhere this morning, tax cheat bazillionaires are clenching:

The Justice Department charged that over several years UBS provided Swiss bank accounts to approximately 20,000 U.S. clients with assets of about $20 billion. About 17,000 of those clients concealed their identities and the existence of their UBS accounts from the IRS, the Justice Department alleged…. 

A Justice Department news release stated that, to avoid being tried on criminal charges, UBS agreed to stop letting U.S. clients use Swiss accounts to hide money from the IRS. However, the commitment wasn’t new: The Swiss bank promised to do just that last year.

All you tax cheats who signed on for a UBS account last year hoping to stash yer remaining cash or illicit TARP-financed bonus award payola in a secret Swiss bank account?

Surprise!

And UBS wasn’t just pulling this stunt in the US of A. Oh no siree. They were also doing it in Canada, dispatching a crack squad of tax cheat helpers from here to there. For years.

Riddle me this, kiddies: Phoreclosure Phil Gramm, erstwhile McCain economic advisor and Republican "deregulation rocks!" guru was running about positing all sorts of nifty ideas throughout the last presidential campaign.

At the same time, Gramm was a board member and lobbyist for UBS, which knew it was under investigation by the DOJ.

In fact, they reached an agreement with the DOJ just last year — during McCain’s campaign — to disclose names of tax cheats. 

Did McCain know?

It’s bad enough that Phoreclosure Phil’s economic theories suck rocks, and that his propensity to dispense favors for all manner of moneyed interests in the form of whatever deregulation they needed to run a scam on the public keeps popping up. (See, e.g., Enron. For starters.)

Just how much did Phil Gramm know about the years of ongoing UBS tax cheat scheme? Because I can’t seem to find anyone who has bothered to ask him outright, even though Gramm was one of the main architects of any number of UBS’ big deals (which have since tanked) the last few years.

Isn’t it time someone asked Gramm publicly what he knew and when? 

And while we’re at it, shouldn’t someone ask Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchinson what she thinks of Gramm’s association with all of this, since he’s her honorary campaign co-chair at the moment? Smarmy is as smarmy does, KayBee.

(YouTube:  Monty Python’s dead parrot sketch.  No particular reason, why do you ask?)


 
89 Responses to "UBS Pays $780M For Aiding Tax Cheats: Where’s Phil Gramm?"
Millineryman | Thursday February 19, 2009 09:10 am 1

When I worked at a big 4 accounting firm, the firm got caught setting up offshore accounts and selling them as investments in their Personal Financial Planning practice.

They however were a private business, and not an elected official. I think it’s time to close in on Phil. Perhaps one of the people who gets caught will drop a dime on Phil becuase their party is over.


RevBev | Thursday February 19, 2009 09:13 am 2

And how would Ennon assets fit into this? Maybe not at all, but Maybe….


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday February 19, 2009 09:14 am 3
In response to RevBev @ 2

Enron assets? Not certain. pattern of Gramm smarmery? Yessiree…


Arbusto | Thursday February 19, 2009 09:26 am 4

Why are the officers who new the illegality of their actions allowed to hide behinds Corporate skirts. That really pisses me off!


RevBev | Thursday February 19, 2009 09:34 am 5
In response to Christy Hardin Smith @ 3

I was thinking about his wife’s position on its Board for quite sometime, as I recall.


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday February 19, 2009 09:38 am 6
In response to RevBev @ 5

See the Enron link above for some background on Phil and Wendy Gramm and Enron…


RevBev | Thursday February 19, 2009 10:31 am 7
In response to Christy Hardin Smith @ 6

Thanks…did not realize that was a link ;)


Jkat | Thursday February 19, 2009 10:58 am 8

i’d like to hear Phil’s answers .. provided they were given immediately before the [edited to remove reference to violence]


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday February 19, 2009 12:47 pm 9
In response to Arbusto @ 4

My guess is that there was a deal cut to avoid criminal prosecutions on multiple levels. And there had to be a substantial amount of risk outstanding for the internal management of a Swiss bank to agree to disclose asset ownership records, eh? That’s just HUGE.

Which makes me wonder what all they really had on them to pressure this deal…


Pfifferling | Thursday February 19, 2009 01:02 pm 10

When I read the NYT article this morning, my first reaction was why wasn’t Gramm’s connection to the bank mentioned. Thank you, Christy, for showing the NYT and the Post how it’s done.

The people hiding their money in places like Switzerland don’t just have government deals like this UBS one to be worried about.

They should also be very afraid of people like the Lichtenstein bank employee who secretly copied and then sold bank account data to the German and US governments last year. One of Germany’s top business executives got caught in it.

And then there was another case of data stolen from a Lichtenstein bank. So, two more reasons for those tax cheat bazillionaires to be very, very worried.

By the way, I love your new place, Christy, and am happy that the greater flexibility it gives you makes it easier for you to be able to continue posting for us. We all win! *G*


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday February 19, 2009 01:06 pm 11
In response to Pfifferling @ 10

The flexibility is really great for me, I have to say, because life here has gotten so crazy. But I’ve got dinner going in the oven, the FIL is taking a nap and The Peanut is having a post-school snack, so I’ve got a little time to catch up on comments. Glad it working for other folks as well.

And I have to say, I was appalled at the lack of Phil Gramm’s name coming up in any US article I saw today, given the fact that the “deal” was worked out last year, which would have been smack dab in the middle of the US presidential campaign when Gramm was McCain’s top economic advisor and author of a great deal of his proposed economic policies.

Just bizarre to omit questions about him that way, don’t you think?


Pfifferling | Thursday February 19, 2009 01:29 pm 12

Yes, the omitting of any mention of Gramm’s name stuck out like a sore thumb.

I try to read as many of the links that you post as I can, or to at least skim them (you sure know how to provide a long reading list *G*).

But another reason I do so is that those clicks lead those sites back here and are one more way to show them what’s being said here. Who knows, maybe Phoreclosure Gramm’s name will start popping up!


Leen | Thursday February 19, 2009 01:46 pm 13

Christy/all did you see the special on Frontline about the bailout? One of the
best

I had had no idea that there was such bad blood between Dick Fuld the CEO of Lehman Brothers and Former Secretary of the Treasury Hank Paulson when Paulson was the CEO at Goldman Sachs. After this special I wondered if a personal agenda had anything to do with Lehman brothers being allowed to sink or be “punched in the face” I think all rich greedy fat cats should be treated the same way
Banking at the Brink
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/…..brink.html


Christy Hardin Smith | Thursday February 19, 2009 02:04 pm 14
In response to Leen @ 13

The Frontline special was superb — for those who missed it, they now have it online at the website and you can see a clip and get background on it here.


cinnamonape | Thursday February 19, 2009 02:05 pm 15

Gramm-Leach-Bliley was one of the biggest contributors to the deregulation that triggered this current recession.

In addition Gramm was not just any executive at UBS, but the Chairman of its North American Investment Division. My suspicion is that he would have been one of those involved in the decision-making related to this scheme. Elliot Spitzer had already placed that division under investigation for selling its customers marked down assets of little value at inflated prices. Whether this then led to someone blowing the whistle on the tax-evasion scheme is unclear. But NY State regulators we’re all over UBS by 2006.

Candy Gramm (oops…Cindy) was on the auditting board for Enron. Enron sold off its oil marketing division in 2003 to UBS, just before it collapsed.


cinnamonape | Thursday February 19, 2009 02:09 pm 16

I’m a little bit pissed off that the Feds only got 750 names from UBS when there are supposedly 17-20,000 people that are involved in these illegal tax-avoidance shemes. And it seems that other Swiss bankers are also upset, since it opens up a precedent. In order to operate within the US they may be compelled to open their books .


nahant | Thursday February 19, 2009 05:21 pm 17

DIGG is open Pups!
Hi Christy great post as always!!
I sure hope this web of cheats reaches the highest levels of the Repuke party!


Blub | Thursday February 19, 2009 05:32 pm 18

Gramm.. hrmph. Time to repeal the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999.. now. It’s to blame for much of what is wrong with the banking system now. And for authoring it + a decade of mendaciousness, incompetence and imbecility, Gramm needs to go riding off into the sunset…..


selise | Thursday February 19, 2009 05:35 pm 19
In response to Blub @ 18

if you’re pissed about gramm-leach-bliley, don’t forget gramm’s partners: rubin and summers (yes that larry summers).


sadlyyes | Thursday February 19, 2009 05:36 pm 20
In response to RevBev @ 2

Wendy?


Hugh | Thursday February 19, 2009 05:36 pm 21

So does this mean that Robert Wolf, UBS’s CEO, get to stay on Obama’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board chaired by Paul Volcker?


barbara | Thursday February 19, 2009 05:37 pm 22

sadlyyes | Thursday February 19, 2009 05:37 pm 23
In response to Christy Hardin Smith @ 9

ewwwwwww ppopcorn and bubbly!


Hugh | Thursday February 19, 2009 05:37 pm 24

Hey Summers is a great man. Just ask him.


sadlyyes | Thursday February 19, 2009 05:40 pm 25

thank you…teevee had a meltdown also Tues.nite…g


selise | Thursday February 19, 2009 05:40 pm 26
In response to Hugh @ 21

jfc. thank you for connecting those dots.


DickDurata | Thursday February 19, 2009 05:40 pm 27

NYT said that only ’several hundred’ customers would be identified. I wonder who gets to pick them, Phil Gramm?


flounder | Thursday February 19, 2009 05:42 pm 28

I’m wondering what sort of wealth preservation tips the McCains and their relatives might have gotten from Gramm and what lists it might have put them on. They sure played tight with their income taxes.


damagedone | Thursday February 19, 2009 05:42 pm 29

WSJ says 52000 accounts.
http://online.wsj.com/article/…..od=testMod

Wonder whether the McCains were involved with UBS since John was such buddy to Phil Gramm; also campaign manager for Gramm in 1996 Presidential campaign if I recall correctly.

Good to see that the State of Alaska has figured out that Sarah Palin owns income tax on the reimbursements for home expenses. I think she also has gross income for the wardrobe she received; that would add a lot to the tax bill.


Blub | Thursday February 19, 2009 05:43 pm 30
In response to selise @ 19

actually, I thought it was a good idea at the time, in theory – the US needed to be able to compete with European and Asian universal banks. But in restrospect it was a complete fail and the regulatory framework needed to run it correctly just wasn’t in place, and now it just needs to be repealed, and the bloated monsters it gave rise to broken up. I actually think that we should repeal parts of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 as well, break up the BHC’s into regional superbanks focused on the consumer and traditional business lending, and strip away their merchant banking and insurance operations, shutting them down and perhaps repackaging some critical components of them into a government-owned National Development of Bank (or banks) of the US, to focus on infrastructure and other essential things….


sadlyyes | Thursday February 19, 2009 05:50 pm 31

for those who missed it

MELTDOWN

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/view/


JimWhite | Thursday February 19, 2009 05:51 pm 32

Thanks for this, Christy. Off the top of your head, do you know what the penalty is for those who get caught hiding assets? Seems to me that a good disincentive would be for the entire asset to be subject to seizure by the US of A. This would make a very good deficit reduction plan.


selise | Thursday February 19, 2009 05:51 pm 33
In response to Blub @ 30

well, i wasn’t even thinking about it at the time – so you are way ahead of me. props to stiglitz though who was against it.

agree re BHC.


Imhotep | Thursday February 19, 2009 05:54 pm 34

Well I hope that Phil reminds the tax cheats not to do any “whining” because they have to pay back taxes.


Hugh | Thursday February 19, 2009 05:56 pm 35

Hey, selise, that TARP visualization you had at the end of the last thread is a keeper. Just brilliant.

http://www.calculatedriskblog……lized.html


barbara | Thursday February 19, 2009 05:58 pm 36

I loved Monty Python. It…calmed me.


selise | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:03 pm 37
In response to Hugh @ 35

glad you liked it.

pups do yourselves a favor and click on hugh’s link. i do not think you will be disappointed.


barbara | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:04 pm 38

I love commenting here at night! You’re all waxing eloquent, steeped in deep thinking and broad knowledge, and when I speak, everyone looks up from their keyboard and says, WTF??


sadlyyes | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:05 pm 39
In response to barbara @ 38

hey Barbs


barbara | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:07 pm 40

Hullo. I’m learning a lot here, believe it or not! *g*


sadlyyes | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:07 pm 41

im getting a cold,furnace broken…weather cold,it finally caught me


sadlyyes | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:08 pm 42

im gonna try gingertea


Eureka Springs | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:10 pm 43
In response to sadlyyes @ 42

What’s your recipe.. anything besides fresh ginger and honey or sugar?


john in sacramento | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:11 pm 44

How do Phil and Wendy Gramm tie in with 4$ a gallon gas, blackouts in California and Enron?

Keith explains the Enron loophole

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaDelhvtQ98


sadlyyes | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:11 pm 45
In response to Eureka Springs @ 43

ill add some lemon too


selise | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:12 pm 46
In response to sadlyyes @ 42

if you have any candied ginger, slice it up and add some for extra ginger goodness. one of the best home remedies i know of for sore throat.


sadlyyes | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:13 pm 47
In response to Eureka Springs @ 43

howzz the arm doin….purrrrrfectling healing i hope….g


barbara | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:14 pm 48
In response to sadlyyes @ 39

Do! How long before furnace is up and running again? Bad time of year for that. Green tea. Chamomile. Lemon tea with ginger. Yum.

I get that the McCains have more money than Dubai (or at least used to have more money than Dubai used to have). Is it possible, do you think, that even with his close ties to Gramm, JMc may not have known the depth and breadth of Phil’s possible up-to-his-ass-in-alligatorness with UBS skullduggery? I keep watching Obama getting blindsided (or so it seems) on some of his picks. Just wondering.


sadlyyes | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:14 pm 49

lise February 19th, 2009 at 6:12 pm
46
In response to sadlyyes @ 42 (show text)

if you have any candied ginger, slice it up and add some for extra ginger goodness. one of the best home remedies i know of for sore throat.
—————
thank you i do…have a huge bag,gotten at the amish store for a mere pittance


sadlyyes | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:16 pm 50

barbara February 19th, 2009 at 6:14 pm
mebbe Sin…dee may have to sell 2 or 3 abodes…heeeheehee


DrBong | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:16 pm 51
In response to sadlyyes @ 49

…and Brandy… lots of Brandy

;~P


Eureka Springs | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:17 pm 52
In response to selise @ 46

I do.. never thought of that, thanks.


Eureka Springs | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:19 pm 53
In response to sadlyyes @ 47

Hanging here like dead weight.. can’t find a remotely comfortable position.

I hope it’s healing… thanks


barbara | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:20 pm 54

Speaking of things to help you sleep at night, from Financial Times via HuffPost:

Iran has built up a stockpile of enough enriched uranium for one nuclear bomb, United Nations officials acknowledged on Thursday.

In a development that comes as the Obama administration is drawing up its policy on negotiations with Tehran over its nuclear programme, UN officials said Iran had produced more nuclear material than previously thought.

And North Korea’s little tyrant is ratcheting up the bellicose rhetoric in time for HRC’s arrival in South Korea.


KayInMaine | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:20 pm 55

Makes you wonder how many “Arthur Andersons” there has been over the last 8 years helping individuals out?


sadlyyes | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:20 pm 56
In response to DrBong @ 51

ill tosssome in for medicinal purposes………………..G


sadlyyes | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:22 pm 57

Eureka Springs February 19th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
53
In response to sadlyyes @ 47 (show text)

Hanging here like dead weight.. can’t find a remotely comfortable position.

I hope it’s healing… thanks

—————–
try a foam rubber pillow under it


marymccurnin | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:24 pm 58
In response to barbara @ 54

and how many countries has Iran attacked lately? geeez


barbara | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:25 pm 59
In response to marymccurnin @ 58

I know! Just wanted to turn up the heat under the pot o’fear.


Eureka Springs | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:25 pm 60
In response to barbara @ 54

key quote in that article

They said Iran had now accumulated more than one tonne of low enriched uranium hexafluoride at a facility in Natanz. If such a quantity were further enriched it could produce more than 20kg of fissile material – enough for a bomb.

A big if.


selise | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:26 pm 61
In response to john in sacramento @ 44

re the video.

the enron loophole was part of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 and it was not just gramm who got it passed. plenty of help from summers et al.

i wrote about some of that in a diary on otc derivatives (the CFMA also prevented their regulation):

http://oxdown.firedoglake.com/diary/2141

also, keith was wrong – the farm bill did not close the enron loophole for oil trading (although it did for natural gas). that was levin’s mistake.


john in sacramento | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:27 pm 62
In response to barbara @ 54

Then there’s this

An Iranian enovy called on Thursday for global negotiations aimed at total nuclear disarmament, saying that the elimination of atomic weapons was the only guarantee against their use or threatened use.

Alireza Moaiyeri, Iranian ambassador to the United Nations in Geneva, addressed the Conference on Disarmament shortly before the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was expected to issue its latest watchdog report on Iran.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1065547.html


barbara | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:27 pm 63
In response to barbara @ 59

And now that I think about it, just exactly what is the rationale for the UN making this announcement as Obama ponders diplomacy. Are we at perpetual loggerheads with the UN? I thought this administration was going to be able to work in tandem with UN. Wrong again?


hackworth | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:28 pm 64
In response to Eureka Springs @ 60

These issues are overblown and designed to induce fear. There are loose nukes and lost nukes. Why should North Korea or Iran be without nukes? The only nations safe thusfar from US attack (hegemonic ambitions) are those with nukes.


barbara | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:31 pm 65
In response to john in sacramento @ 62

Big disconnect between this and the Financial Times piece, isn’t there? In tone, if not in substance. If one reads the one without the other…well, you know….


ibfreenow | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:31 pm 66

Wanna putta dent in da Deficit?
Take every f’ing penny that was put in those accounts and confiscate it. Then, charge the normal Federal, and State, AND Local tax rates on ever f’ing penny since the money was put in. Now, add penalties.
You wanted to play ‘hide-and-go-seek’ with taxpayer’s money? OK. Now that we’ve FOUND it, WE SEEK YOUR HIDE!
A pound of flesh for every penny hidden. “Where would you like the first slice, my Lord? Or, would you prefer to pay your pound of flesh in a LUMP SUM?”
No deals! Pay, or go bankrupt like the rest of the country you greedy, heartless, fucking bastard’s ruined.
Can’t pay? We’ll set up a generational payment system (after all, since you didn’t want the ‘Death Tax’ to impinge on giving your heirs your profit’s, you can’t object to them paying off your debt’s, now can you?).
Don’t want to pay? Sharpen the blades on the guillotine’s, and confiscate EVERY penny! There’s your Death Tax for ya, MFer’s!
Now, let’s look for the the rest of the hidden accounts in the world! Same deal, boys and girls!


selise | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:32 pm 67

ES and sadlyyes – hope you are both feeling better very soon.


hackworth | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:32 pm 68

I know an American that is suing UBS for losing most of his money. A substantial portion of it was supposed to be insured against loss (taxes too, I guess).


Eureka Springs | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:33 pm 69
In response to sadlyyes @ 57

I look like a pillow monster with a laptop now! *s*


Eureka Springs | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:35 pm 70
In response to hackworth @ 64

Couldn’t agree more.. and the publication and author should hear from us.


barbara | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:35 pm 71
In response to Eureka Springs @ 69

Slings no longer an option? I can’t remember exactly where and how immobilized your break is.


Bustednuckles | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:36 pm 72

So, we can look forward to some serious disclosure here.
HMMM, maybe we shall see some bankers with their shorts around their ankles?

I am all for that shit.
Next, I want to see those Bahama Island accounts exposed.
All that fucking money went somewhere.


albertchampion | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:37 pm 73

it was wendy gramm. she figured in a lot of shenanigans. she was head of the cftc as well as being a director of enron. many thought this was a colossal conflict of interest. but, hey, it was that democratic clinton administration, right?

don’t fail to note that corruption is bipartisan. as i think you will be learning during this new democratic regime. many of the same players. and if not the same players, agents of the same interests.

i have a friend who was a senior vp of ubs when phil was hired. he eventually left ubs in opposition to that hiring. in many conversations with him, it was clear that phil was really hired as the ceo of money laundering….especially narcotrafficking. this is an investigation that should be conducted, but will not be. it is the real story of why the major banks were bailed out…the gangsters wanted their money and threatened murder, maiming and mayhem until their invested assets were returned. that is why there can be no tracking of that first tranche of tarp funds….they all went to the russian-israeli-sicilian-colombian-mexican narcotrafficantes.

the country with even more interesting bank secrecy laws is israel. though the usg has been forcing chur, luxembourg, lichtenstein to give up their us citizen account holders, no similar pressure has been placed on israel. and this gets very interesting when one contemplates bernie madoff. though the “official” story is that madoff was operating a ponzi scheme[and certainly that might have been part of his scam], i think he was also running a money laundry[transferring some individuals us assets from the usa to secret bank accounts in israel]. this would be a pretty nifty scam…certain investors could get assets out of the usa, hide them in secret israeli bank accounts, claim that they were the victims of financial fraud and theft, become reimbursed by the usa[or finra, or sipc]. a form of double indemnity?

i often think that bernie might be better identified as bernie mossad.

where else are there bank secrecy arrangements? well, enron liked using the cayman islands. who can tell me what efforts have been made to track assets sheltered in the cayman islands since the demise of enron?

the netherlands antilles? used to be a shelter. is it still?

then bermuda; isle of man; isles of jersey, sark, guernsey; san marino; mallorca. any others come to mind?

switzerland has become so ruffled by the usg’s efforts to uncover secret bank accounts, that it will no longer accept acknowledged, upfront, accounts from american citizens. american corporations, however, no problem.

but in another sense, it is reprehensible that the usg is making it impossible for us citizens to shelter their assets in a less erstwhile fascist state[usa]. i think that you will not be wanting to have any of your assets denominated in usdollars and in us banks in the years to come. the obombya team is going to destroy the value of those fiat currency,”paper” assets…the us citizenry is slated to become impoverished by its government. i could be wrong, but as i understand it, after 31/12/09, it will be illegal for a us citizen to move its assets outside of the the continental usa.

john mccain may have gotten it accurately when he greeted his audience in what was thought to be a mispeak….”my fellow prisoners.”


barbara | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:38 pm 74
In response to Eureka Springs @ 60

It occurs to me that, at least for the past eight years, we are the black pot doing the calling. Haven’t “gone nuclear” on our enemies lately, but have illustrated in spades our hair trigger with respect to launching other weaponry. Which is the rogue nation?


Eureka Springs | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:39 pm 75
In response to barbara @ 71

Oh it’s in a sling always.


sadlyyes | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:39 pm 76
In response to Bustednuckles @ 72

Caymans
Turks and Caicos


Eureka Springs | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:41 pm 77

Which is the rogue nation?

Without question.. my nation is the one which both scares and embarrasses me the most.


Eureka Springs | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:43 pm 78
In response to Bustednuckles @ 72

Would be very interested to know who banks in Uruguay.


john in sacramento | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:46 pm 79
In response to barbara @ 65

Yup. Hopefully he’s not just blowing smoke.

It kinda reminds me of that 60 Minutes interview with Amadinnerjacket (have no idea how to spell his name and too lazy to google) where they made it sound like he was calling for the destruction of Israel but edited out all the context to what he was actually saying (he probably is crazy but I take what most of media says with a healthy grain of salt)

selise @ 61 thanks, I’ll have to go back later and read when I have more time


ibfreenow | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:48 pm 80

Well, you go Uruguay, and I’ll go mine! (the Great Groucho).


barbara | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:48 pm 81
In response to Eureka Springs @ 75

Oh, rats. Or good. Or both. Want some of my butter pecan ice cream?


hackworth | Thursday February 19, 2009 06:49 pm 82

Noam Chomsky, Chalmers Johnson, Smedley Butler, Hugo Chavez, Fidel Castro, Gore Vidal and dozens of others have pontificated on this topic ad nauseum for years. The US is obviously the agressor with the trillion dollar military “budget” and all the accoutrements .


Eureka Springs | Thursday February 19, 2009 07:01 pm 83
In response to barbara @ 81

Yes please…)


barbara | Thursday February 19, 2009 07:05 pm 84

Close your eyes, open your mouth…here it comes…rich, buttery vanilla-colored ice cream (Edy’s Slow Churned), filled with loverly chunks of pecans…nice, eh?


Eureka Springs | Thursday February 19, 2009 07:07 pm 85

I like it down here in pastel land…)


albertchampion | Thursday February 19, 2009 07:12 pm 86

uruguay is a very important locus for afghan opium refining. and it has dropped off the radar screen.

for all practical purposes, the reverend sun myung moon owns uruguay. operates the heroin refineries.

if you don’t know the totality of the reverend moon operations, you can reference bob parry and john gorenfield[sic].


Hmmm | Thursday February 19, 2009 08:15 pm 87

Yanno, today I actually have the first furtive stirrings of a hopeful feeling that between UBS/Philgramm, Rove, Gitmo leakers, Coleman, Pelosi’s positive talk about Bushie indictments, etc., we might — just might, mind — be on the verge of seeing a serious outbreak of justice here.

On the other hand, it could just be the sugar talking…


Robt | Friday February 20, 2009 01:21 am 88

Phil Gramm was last seen telling the American people on the TV, from the McCain campaign that Americans were “Whiners”.

You think Carly Fiorina is one of those accounts?

Will the list of these tax evader’s names be made public?

And what about the Cayman Islands?


Jkat | Friday February 20, 2009 01:32 am 89

hmmmm.. maybe an agressive pursuit of the individual who have probably acted improperly in the run up to our developing financial calamity ..and fining the pure-de-living hell out of them could reduce the deficits a bit eh ??

i’m think especially of the rating agencies who allowed the bundling and rebundling of the shaky loans [ -BBB’s?] to magically get rated as AAA’s by virtue of having been been all lumped together .. i think must have used magic string to tie those bundles together .. eh .. and surely they could be made to cough a few bucks for their obvious malfeasance ..

all in all $780 m ain’t a bad start .. wonder how much we’ll collect off the 20k+ scofflaws ??


Sorry but the comments are closed on this post

Close