<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inside The Economic Meltdown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/02/17/inside-the-economic-meltdown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/02/17/inside-the-economic-meltdown/</link>
	<description>Dip your toe in the legal waters and change politics as you know it.  http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:06:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: newtonusr</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/02/17/inside-the-economic-meltdown/#comment-2237</link>
		<dc:creator>newtonusr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/02/17/inside-the-economic-meltdown/#comment-2237</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;thanks loads!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks loads!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliott</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/02/17/inside-the-economic-meltdown/#comment-2236</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/02/17/inside-the-economic-meltdown/#comment-2236</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Here’s a review from the Boston Globe&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;‘Inside the Meltdown,” which airs tonight on WGBH, provides the clearest explanation I’ve seen of how last year’s catastrophic collapse of our economy occurred. It is an indispensable primer on the financial carnage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As the title of the program connotes, this is an insider’s view of the story. We get knowing analysis by experts speaking in plain English, rather than unfathomable Wall Street argot.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Michael Kirk, the gifted documentarian who wrote, directed, and produced “Meltdown,” provides the other element crucial to a good story: tick-tock - the term journalists use for close linear coverage of a chain of events. Kudos to Kirk for the clarity of his writing and to Jim Gilmore for heroic reporting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The pacing of the show moves crisply through the series of nightmares. There is tension throughout the one-hour program despite the fact that we know vaguely what happened.  &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/ae/tv/articles/2009/02/17/frontline_sorts_through_the_wall_street_carnage/?p1=Well_MostPop_Emailed2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s a review from the Boston Globe</p>
<blockquote><p>‘Inside the Meltdown,” which airs tonight on WGBH, provides the clearest explanation I’ve seen of how last year’s catastrophic collapse of our economy occurred. It is an indispensable primer on the financial carnage.</p>
<p>As the title of the program connotes, this is an insider’s view of the story. We get knowing analysis by experts speaking in plain English, rather than unfathomable Wall Street argot.</p>
<p>Michael Kirk, the gifted documentarian who wrote, directed, and produced “Meltdown,” provides the other element crucial to a good story: tick-tock &#8211; the term journalists use for close linear coverage of a chain of events. Kudos to Kirk for the clarity of his writing and to Jim Gilmore for heroic reporting.</p>
<p>The pacing of the show moves crisply through the series of nightmares. There is tension throughout the one-hour program despite the fact that we know vaguely what happened.  <strong><em><a href="http://www.boston.com/ae/tv/articles/2009/02/17/frontline_sorts_through_the_wall_street_carnage/?p1=Well_MostPop_Emailed2" rel="nofollow">more</a></em></strong></p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bluetoe2</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/02/17/inside-the-economic-meltdown/#comment-2235</link>
		<dc:creator>Bluetoe2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/02/17/inside-the-economic-meltdown/#comment-2235</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Christy for the insights on the “process.”  I’ll remain sketptical, however, until Rove is behind bars.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Christy for the insights on the “process.”  I’ll remain sketptical, however, until Rove is behind bars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Hardin Smith</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/02/17/inside-the-economic-meltdown/#comment-2231</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Hardin Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/02/17/inside-the-economic-meltdown/#comment-2231</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;And let me clarify — this is what you do with someone who is represented by counsel, either for a courtroom appearance, a deposition or a testimony issue before Congress — you have to satisfy legal requirements to do a lawful subpoena or they fight the suboena tooth and nail and waste your time; you have to issue it for a day that will work with the person from whom testimony is requested, otherwise you end up having to reschedule; and so on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you can work out some of those details in advance — especially checking scheduling?  Then you do.  And that’s what a lot of this is.  The Bolten/Miers thing deals with their holdover assertion of privilege which, I gather from any number of places, the Obama folks are nudging them to work out…or they’ll step in and work it out for them, which the Bush people will not want to happen.  So they’ll most likely work something out beforehand.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It’s like litigation, but a higher level of hardball involved.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And let me clarify — this is what you do with someone who is represented by counsel, either for a courtroom appearance, a deposition or a testimony issue before Congress — you have to satisfy legal requirements to do a lawful subpoena or they fight the suboena tooth and nail and waste your time; you have to issue it for a day that will work with the person from whom testimony is requested, otherwise you end up having to reschedule; and so on.</p>
<p>If you can work out some of those details in advance — especially checking scheduling?  Then you do.  And that’s what a lot of this is.  The Bolten/Miers thing deals with their holdover assertion of privilege which, I gather from any number of places, the Obama folks are nudging them to work out…or they’ll step in and work it out for them, which the Bush people will not want to happen.  So they’ll most likely work something out beforehand.</p>
<p>It’s like litigation, but a higher level of hardball involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Hardin Smith</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/02/17/inside-the-economic-meltdown/#comment-2230</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Hardin Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/02/17/inside-the-economic-meltdown/#comment-2230</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;No — it’s what lawyers do.  And in Rove’s case, he’s been subpoenaed and will appear.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No — it’s what lawyers do.  And in Rove’s case, he’s been subpoenaed and will appear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bluetoe2</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/02/17/inside-the-economic-meltdown/#comment-2229</link>
		<dc:creator>Bluetoe2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/02/17/inside-the-economic-meltdown/#comment-2229</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Don’t you find it rather troubling that the WH wants to see Rove and Congress work out a “compromise”?  I find it troubling.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don’t you find it rather troubling that the WH wants to see Rove and Congress work out a “compromise”?  I find it troubling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Hardin Smith</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/02/17/inside-the-economic-meltdown/#comment-2226</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Hardin Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/02/17/inside-the-economic-meltdown/#comment-2226</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just talked to a source on the Hill — there is no hold-up on the Rove testimony and/or subpoena.  He’s set for Feb. 23rd, with no changes that anyone is aware of at this point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The only question at this point on executive privilege that’s still open-ended has more to do with the Miers/Bolten testimony than anything else — that’s what’s still dangling out for negotiations, per my source — and those negotiations are active.  Just FYI.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just talked to a source on the Hill — there is no hold-up on the Rove testimony and/or subpoena.  He’s set for Feb. 23rd, with no changes that anyone is aware of at this point.</p>
<p>The only question at this point on executive privilege that’s still open-ended has more to do with the Miers/Bolten testimony than anything else — that’s what’s still dangling out for negotiations, per my source — and those negotiations are active.  Just FYI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Hardin Smith</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/02/17/inside-the-economic-meltdown/#comment-2222</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Hardin Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/02/17/inside-the-economic-meltdown/#comment-2222</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;btw, gang, there’s &lt;a href=&quot;http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/02/17/opr-report-will-it-undercut-cheneys-legal-reliance-excuses/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a fresh post up top&lt;/a&gt; if anyone wants a new read…and I have a couple of queries in with folks on the Hill just in case on the Rove subpoena issue.  Will let you all know if I hear anything specific back.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw, gang, there’s <a href="http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/02/17/opr-report-will-it-undercut-cheneys-legal-reliance-excuses/" rel="nofollow">a fresh post up top</a> if anyone wants a new read…and I have a couple of queries in with folks on the Hill just in case on the Rove subpoena issue.  Will let you all know if I hear anything specific back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phoenix Woman</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/02/17/inside-the-economic-meltdown/#comment-2221</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenix Woman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/02/17/inside-the-economic-meltdown/#comment-2221</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Christy, I don’t see anything other than the two-week delay request you’ve just mentioned.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christy, I don’t see anything other than the two-week delay request you’ve just mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy Hardin Smith</title>
		<link>http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/02/17/inside-the-economic-meltdown/#comment-2220</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy Hardin Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://christyhardinsmith.firedoglake.com/2009/02/17/inside-the-economic-meltdown/#comment-2220</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Here’s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics/AP/story/906993.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;another piece from McClatchy&lt;/a&gt; that essentially says the same thing.  Reads to me as though Obama’s legal team is trying to push Rove and the House Judiciary committee to negotiate something both sides can live with and move forward.  McClatchy says they’ve asked for a two week review period, not that they are trying to block testimony altogether.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s <a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics/AP/story/906993.html" rel="nofollow">another piece from McClatchy</a> that essentially says the same thing.  Reads to me as though Obama’s legal team is trying to push Rove and the House Judiciary committee to negotiate something both sides can live with and move forward.  McClatchy says they’ve asked for a two week review period, not that they are trying to block testimony altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.207 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-17 11:40:37 -->

