OPR Report: Will It Undercut Cheney’s Legal Reliance Excuses?
Trouble At The Dick And George Corral?

Inside The Economic Meltdown

This evening, PBS’ Frontline will air a documentary on the economic meltdown. The previews are blunt, painful, and a needed step in parsing self-serving spin from ugly realities.

From the advance description:

…Paulson pushed Lehman’s CEO Dick Fuld to find a buyer for his ailing company. But no company would buy Lehman unless the government offered a deal similar to the one Bear Stearns had received. Paulson refused, and Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy.

FRONTLINE then chronicles the disaster that followed. Within 24 hours, the stock market crashed, and credit markets around the world froze. “We’re no longer talking about mortgages,” says economist Gertler. “We’re talking about car loans, loans to small businesses, commercial paper borrowing by large banks. This is like a disease spreading.”

“I think that the secretary of the Treasury could not fully comprehend what that linkage was and the extent to which this would materialize into problems,” says former Lehman board member Henry Kaufman.

Paulson was thunderstruck. “This is the utter nightmare of an economic policy-maker,” Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman tells FRONTLINE. “You may have just made the decision that destroyed the world. Absolutely terrifying moment.”…

It can be awfully comfortable to look backward and second-guess someone else’s decision made amidst an advancing storm. Especially from the outside.

But to have an opportunity to dissect how decisions were made this close in time, discussing amongst people either consulted or immediately impacted? And, better yet, to learn from those mistakes as you try to stave off yet another gathering storm to the extent humanly possible?

You have an obligation to the generations to come to learn those lessons.  No matter how shattering or how much they may alter the landscape ahead.

Which is why CNBC’s offering, "House of Cards," which began playing this month as well, is puzzling in its attempt to shield diva pundit Larry Kudlow from critique:

The CNBC documentary closely follows Mr. Bass’s line of thought, but for perhaps obvious reasons it does not cite a letter of warning he wrote to investors in July 2007. “Consequently, when I hear people like Kudlow on CNBC tell their viewers that the subprime problem is ‘contained,’ I can hardly bear to watch,” Mr. Bass wrote, referring to Larry Kudlow, host of CNBC’s “Kudlow & Company.”

I’ll watch them both, warts and all. Recorded CNBC’s last night and have TIVO set for PBS tonight.

Call me cynical, but I’d prefer that television journalism concentrate more on the warts, and less on polishing turds up for public consumption.  Sort of the I.F. Stone model of questioning everyone’s motives and actions, because people close to power tend to lie.

You can check your local listings here for Frontline.

  Spotlight
20 Responses to "Inside The Economic Meltdown"
Elliott | Tuesday February 17, 2009 07:26 am 1

This really does look like must-see-teeVee


Christy Hardin Smith | Tuesday February 17, 2009 07:28 am 2
In response to Elliott @ 1

I recorded the CNBC one last night — watched a bit of it and it was interesting to see the attempt to lay some things out while downplaying any CNBC fault in pushing some of the crapola.

Plan on watching the whole thing fresh today. Anyone else see it?

The promo information for Frontline looks fantastic — but, again, plan on watching the whole of it fresh once it airs.


Elliott | Tuesday February 17, 2009 07:34 am 3
In response to Christy Hardin Smith @ 2

the clips I saw of it seems interesting, you’re right CNBC’s take on it will be most revealing. No accountability now there.


dakine01 | Tuesday February 17, 2009 08:58 am 4

Larry Kudlow is one of if not THE most clueless individuals on TV. All-in-all, I think I would ask for proper verification if he told me the sun rises in the East and the sky is blue.


Teddy Partridge | Tuesday February 17, 2009 10:32 am 5

Hank Paulson might have boarded it late, but he sure rode that “no one could have anticipated” train right up until the end. Now he needs to ride it right to Leavenworth.

Not just incompetent; corrupt too!


Bluetoe2 | Tuesday February 17, 2009 10:57 am 6

OT, CBS is reporting that the Obama administration is backing Karl Rove’s right not to testify before Congress!!!


Ann in AZ | Tuesday February 17, 2009 11:13 am 7
In response to Bluetoe2 @ 6

So Obama thinks that no one is above the law, huh! Except all the President’s men? Since when, since he became President? This has been another addition of the Children’s Playhouse and todays letters are BS.


Christy Hardin Smith | Tuesday February 17, 2009 11:41 am 8
In response to Bluetoe2 @ 6

Not what I heard as of this morning — what the Obama WH requested was a delay to study the implication on WH privilege versus the facts of Rove’s particular case because of issues raised by legal folks for the Bush WH. There has been no request to block testimony of which I’m aware unless it’s happened in the last few minutes. And I can’t find any wire story to that effect as yet, either.

Anyone have a link?


Christy Hardin Smith | Tuesday February 17, 2009 11:48 am 9

Only story I can find on CBS’ website says the WH is reviewing the matter, but that no decisions on their stance on Rove’s testimony has been made. That’s from Saturday — they don’t have an update posted that I see.


Phoenix Woman | Tuesday February 17, 2009 11:49 am 10

Recovery.gov’s Estimated Jobs Effect tracker:

http://www.recovery.gov/?q=con…..job-effect


Christy Hardin Smith | Tuesday February 17, 2009 11:51 am 11

Here’s another piece from McClatchy that essentially says the same thing. Reads to me as though Obama’s legal team is trying to push Rove and the House Judiciary committee to negotiate something both sides can live with and move forward. McClatchy says they’ve asked for a two week review period, not that they are trying to block testimony altogether.


Phoenix Woman | Tuesday February 17, 2009 11:53 am 12

Christy, I don’t see anything other than the two-week delay request you’ve just mentioned.


Christy Hardin Smith | Tuesday February 17, 2009 12:00 pm 13

btw, gang, there’s a fresh post up top if anyone wants a new read…and I have a couple of queries in with folks on the Hill just in case on the Rove subpoena issue. Will let you all know if I hear anything specific back.


Christy Hardin Smith | Tuesday February 17, 2009 12:37 pm 14

Just talked to a source on the Hill — there is no hold-up on the Rove testimony and/or subpoena. He’s set for Feb. 23rd, with no changes that anyone is aware of at this point.

The only question at this point on executive privilege that’s still open-ended has more to do with the Miers/Bolten testimony than anything else — that’s what’s still dangling out for negotiations, per my source — and those negotiations are active. Just FYI.


Bluetoe2 | Tuesday February 17, 2009 12:39 pm 15

Don’t you find it rather troubling that the WH wants to see Rove and Congress work out a “compromise”? I find it troubling.


Christy Hardin Smith | Tuesday February 17, 2009 12:42 pm 16
In response to Bluetoe2 @ 15

No — it’s what lawyers do. And in Rove’s case, he’s been subpoenaed and will appear.


Christy Hardin Smith | Tuesday February 17, 2009 12:45 pm 17

And let me clarify — this is what you do with someone who is represented by counsel, either for a courtroom appearance, a deposition or a testimony issue before Congress — you have to satisfy legal requirements to do a lawful subpoena or they fight the suboena tooth and nail and waste your time; you have to issue it for a day that will work with the person from whom testimony is requested, otherwise you end up having to reschedule; and so on.

If you can work out some of those details in advance — especially checking scheduling? Then you do. And that’s what a lot of this is. The Bolten/Miers thing deals with their holdover assertion of privilege which, I gather from any number of places, the Obama folks are nudging them to work out…or they’ll step in and work it out for them, which the Bush people will not want to happen. So they’ll most likely work something out beforehand.

It’s like litigation, but a higher level of hardball involved.


Bluetoe2 | Tuesday February 17, 2009 01:30 pm 18

Thanks Christy for the insights on the “process.” I’ll remain sketptical, however, until Rove is behind bars.


Elliott | Tuesday February 17, 2009 01:36 pm 19

Here’s a review from the Boston Globe

‘Inside the Meltdown,” which airs tonight on WGBH, provides the clearest explanation I’ve seen of how last year’s catastrophic collapse of our economy occurred. It is an indispensable primer on the financial carnage.

As the title of the program connotes, this is an insider’s view of the story. We get knowing analysis by experts speaking in plain English, rather than unfathomable Wall Street argot.

Michael Kirk, the gifted documentarian who wrote, directed, and produced “Meltdown,” provides the other element crucial to a good story: tick-tock – the term journalists use for close linear coverage of a chain of events. Kudos to Kirk for the clarity of his writing and to Jim Gilmore for heroic reporting.

The pacing of the show moves crisply through the series of nightmares. There is tension throughout the one-hour program despite the fact that we know vaguely what happened. more


newtonusr | Tuesday February 17, 2009 02:00 pm 20
In response to Elliott @ 19

thanks loads!


Sorry but the comments are closed on this post
Trouble At The Dick And George Corral?
OPR Report: Will It Undercut Cheney’s Legal Reliance Excuses?

Close